Teams

IE-RCC-Li

2024 So Cal Mixed Doubles Tri-Level - IE · Mixed Tri-Level 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-27vs IE-MTC-ShelterWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Hong Ye vs Rebecca Cloyd / Renzo Rodriguez6-3, 6-2
2024-10-19vs IE-LLW-Andulka-Nutty Mix-UngeheuerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Hong Ye vs Christopher Enciso / Ilse Ungeheuer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMinglu Ding / Natalie Nofsinger vs Joe Lopez / Virginia Chang2-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs IE-Silver Lakes-NorikoWon 10
W#1 DoublesHong Ye / Heidi Schuler vs Allison Samp / Adam Kasbon6-3, 6-1
2024-09-28vs IE-Andulka-Mixed Nuts-PereyraLost 01
L#2 DoublesMinglu Ding / Natalie Nofsinger vs Alfonso Nevarez / Saleshnie Sukhram7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Tri-Level 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.54
Hong Ye
published
3.20
Cindy Ziqing Lin
published 3.5
3.17
Natalie Nofsinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Qianfeng Li
published
2.81
Lydia Wong
published
2.74
Arianna Johnson
published 3
Maen Shaar
published
Mallory Whyte
published
Xinke Chen
published
Yibo Gu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Hong Ye
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Cindy Ziqing Lin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Natalie Nofsinger
32W–48L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Qianfeng Li
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.97
Lydia Wong
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.81
3
Arianna Johnson
7W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Maen Shaar
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mallory Whyte
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Xinke Chen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yibo Gu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.