Teams

Savino/Halter

2023 Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over · Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs CoxSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSandra Savino vs Beth Skolnick3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichella Newton / Courtney Kellam vs Beth Kulas / Elizabeth Peterson7-6, 6-4
2023-07-11vs CamdenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandra Savino / Stephanie Granger vs Erin Camden / Kelly Long4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Anne Marie Burroughs vs Laura Smith / Christine Cowen6-0, 6-0
2023-07-05vs NewtonWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnne Marie Burroughs / Courtney Kellam vs Shannon Dupre / Marcela Anongos6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Rekant / Sandra Savino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-27vs CoxSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichella Newton / Courtney Kellam vs Elizabeth Peterson / Faye Downey6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandra Savino / Barbara Durso vs Beth Skolnick / Jenna DeLigio6-7, 3-6
2023-06-20vs CamdenWon 10
W#3 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Grayson Kellam vs Laura Smith / Katie LeGrande6-1, 6-4
2023-06-13vs NewtonWon 10
W#3 DoublesJen Lagow / Courtney Kellam vs Shannon Dupre / Helen Miller6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Tessa Robinson
published
3.65
Courtney Kellam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Michella Newton
published
3.58
Stephanie Granger
published
3.36
Shannon Halter
published
3.27
Barbara Durso
published 3.5
3.18
Julie Rekant
published
3.15
Rosanne Simon
published
3.15
Grayson Kellam
published
3.03
Sandra Savino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Jen Lagow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Savino + Anne Marie Burroughs134 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Savino + Grayson Kellam044 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Savino + Courtney Kellam134 matchesnot enough data
Tessa Robinson + Michella Newton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tessa Robinson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Courtney Kellam
120W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Michella Newton
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Stephanie Granger
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.58
Shannon Halter
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Barbara Durso
17W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Julie Rekant
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Rosanne Simon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Grayson Kellam
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Sandra Savino
43W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Anne Marie Burroughs
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jen Lagow
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.