Teams

HRCA-N NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-01vs GAC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Larsen / Mark Stangeland vs Jay McMullan / Greg Mcmullan5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Swift / Don Carter vs Whitney Grimm / Erik Ratkelis3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChristopher Wiksten vs Max Grassby1-6, 4-6
2023-05-31vs SS-H REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Swift / Christopher Wiksten vs Jason Bisanti / Stehan Ceronio6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Larsen / Andrew Taylor vs Brian Giesecke / Ryan Schellpeper3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCody Mckay / Mark Stangeland vs Craig Steinfeld / Craig Stromberg5-7, 6-7
2023-05-05vs SS-HP BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesCody Mckay / Matt Culig vs Henry Schloss / Fadi Zakhem7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Chung / Mark Stangeland vs Warren Adams / Eddie Pells6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-04vs LEBTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJade Walle / Andrew Taylor vs Matthew Bruff / Paul Whipple6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMark Chung vs Andre Greene6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Wiksten / Thomas Larsen vs Jordan Jacob / Benjamin Walker2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Swift / Mark Stangeland vs Jim Carpenter / Josh Dougan2-6, 4-6
2023-04-27vs GAC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Wiksten / Mark Stangeland vs Daniel Green / Jacob Toffler6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Larsen / Jade Walle vs Jay McMullan / Erik Ratkelis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Swift / Cody Mckay vs Whitney Grimm / Max Grassby6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CVTA GREY70251029290
2DTC SILVER6126922262
3LEBTC GREEN61231237328
4BTA-CU ORANGE5227820234
5SS-H RED52211433298
6MEA NAVY43221333318
7CM PURPLE33121840295
8ATC BLUE24141637251
9SKY GREEN24131740291
10SS-HP BLUE24111941293
11MEA PURPLE24102044312
12HRCA-N RED25122354371
13BRMST RED15102043307
14SS-H BLUE1672858378
15CR-B RED1682758375
16HRCA-N NAVY0571840275
17LTA-Q BLACK0632754333
18WP-B BLUE0762961396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Cody Mckay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Christopher Wiksten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Mark Stangeland
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.03
Jade Walle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.83
Brian Swift
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Don Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Mark Chung
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matt Culig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tane Olsen
published
Thomas Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cody Mckay + Matt Culig4248% games−0.4% vs expected
Mark Stangeland + Christopher Wiksten2344% games−4.0% vs expected
Mark Stangeland + Brian Swift1539% games−5.7% vs expected
Mark Stangeland + Thomas Larsen2442% games−5.8% vs expected
Christopher Wiksten + Thomas Larsen3542% games−6.4% vs expected
Brian Swift + Thomas Larsen4541% games−11.3% vs expected
Brian Swift + Christopher Wiksten123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Swift + Matt Culig033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cody Mckay
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Christopher Wiksten
21W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Mark Stangeland
19W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Jade Walle
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Brian Swift
41W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Don Carter
7W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.59
Mark Chung
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Culig
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tane Olsen
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Larsen
21W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.