Teams

ATC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-04vs SS-H REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Donnelly / Brett Fischer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Speer / Huntington Walker vs Brian Giesecke / Ryan Schellpeper0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesZachary Davis / Charles Roosevelt vs Jason Bisanti / Craig Stromberg2-6, 2-6
2023-06-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Washburne / Bernard Darre vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Roosevelt / William Morris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-28vs LEBTC BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Donnelly / Daniel Washburne vs Chip Hudson / Josh Dougan2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesZachary Davis / Nicholas Morris vs Jim Carpenter / Andre Greene5-7, 3-6
2023-05-04vs GAC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Brown / Huntington Walker vs Daniel Green / Jacob Toffler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Washburne / Bernard Darre vs Dillon Corkran / Erik Ratkelis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Roosevelt / John Speer vs Jay McMullan / John Moneypenny6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-27vs SS-HP BLUEWon 21
W#1 SinglesZachary Bishop vs Will Essin6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Brown / Brett Fischer vs Bradley Miller / Dan Murphy7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Roosevelt / Jim Chrisman vs Warren Adams / Bill Speck3-6, 2-6
2023-04-20vs SS-H REDLost 12
L#2 DoublesChristopher Haymons / Huntington Walker vs Paul Jaszewski / Ryan Schellpeper4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesZachary Bishop vs Tomo Watanabe1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrett Fischer / John Speer vs Jordi Goodman / Craig Stromberg4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CVTA GREY70251029290
2DTC SILVER6126922262
3LEBTC GREEN61231237328
4BTA-CU ORANGE5227820234
5SS-H RED52211433298
6MEA NAVY43221333318
7CM PURPLE33121840295
8ATC BLUE24141637251
9SKY GREEN24131740291
10SS-HP BLUE24111941293
11MEA PURPLE24102044312
12HRCA-N RED25122354371
13BRMST RED15102043307
14SS-H BLUE1672858378
15CR-B RED1682758375
16HRCA-N NAVY0571840275
17LTA-Q BLACK0632754333
18WP-B BLUE0762961396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Zachary Bishop
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.26
Brett Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Charles Roosevelt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Daniel Washburne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Huntington Walker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
John Speer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Zachary Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Randy Swenson
published
Bernard Darre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christopher Haymons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Chrisman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Domich
published
Nicholas Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Fischer + Zachary Bishop4159% games−2.3% vs expected
Charles Roosevelt + Daniel Washburne5152% games−2.8% vs expected
Charles Roosevelt + John Speer2540% games−4.6% vs expected
John Speer + Huntington Walker11043% games−5.7% vs expected
Charles Roosevelt + Huntington Walker1538% games−6.5% vs expected
Brett Fischer + Daniel Washburne1544% games−13.5% vs expected
Daniel Washburne + Huntington Walker3640% games−16.0% vs expected
John Speer + Jim Chrisman2642% games−16.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Bishop
33W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Brett Fischer
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Charles Roosevelt
25W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Daniel Washburne
43W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Huntington Walker
15W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
John Speer
12W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.83
Zachary Davis
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Randy Swenson
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Bernard Darre
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Christopher Haymons
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jim Chrisman
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Domich
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Morris
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.