Teams

V - WACky Girls

2021 USTA Adult 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-12vs V - Set2WinWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Whipple / Beth Bearer vs Lana Colvin / Mary Snow6-4, 6-3
2021-06-05vs V - Las Posas Got ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Bearer / Rachel Lee vs Sandy Schomaker / Mariana Schindler7-5, 6-3
2021-05-21vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Mealer / Leslie Silverman vs Nicole Mitchell / Marie Smith3-6, 3-6
2021-05-15vs V - Mission Oaks GalsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Mealer / Leslie Silverman vs Julie Hill / Kate Torrence3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs V - Royal AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Leslie Silverman vs Sylvie Guerin / Lisa Trombley6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Bearer / Pamela Cole vs Stella Dumlao-Idea / Geraldine Farrell6-3, 7-5
2021-04-16vs V - WAC T Castle Spring 2021Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Leslie Silverman vs Jane Nemcova / Patti Wilson5-7, 1-6
2021-04-09vs V - North Ranch Ace AngelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Kathleen Schatz vs Susan Friedman / Tracy Collins1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Cole / Beth Bearer vs Sonia Bekian / Erin Walker3-6, 3-6
2021-04-03vs V - Ojai OrangesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Kathleen Schatz vs Jane ODell / Katrina Rice Schmidt4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Bearer / Cindy Giammarrusco vs Kathy Bergmann / Deisy Lotz6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Laura Mealer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
published 3.5
3.11
Leslie Silverman
published
3.10
Maryrose Bleier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Beth Bearer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Judy Caparon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Mealer + Maryrose Bleier171449% gamesnot enough data
Laura Mealer + Beth Bearer5455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Mealer
88W–86L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Leslie Silverman
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Maryrose Bleier
72W–92L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Beth Bearer
87W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Judy Caparon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.