Teams

CV-SoCal

CV-70s Shootout Invitational · CV-Women 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV-Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Marjo Hull
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Janet Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Marne Albracht
usually #9 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Cynthia Reyes
published 4
3.61
Sally Mangina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Marie Allman
published
3.56
Ann Habeger
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #5 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #9 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Barbara Johns
published 3.5
Edna Swart
published
Farzaneh Kia
published
Jill Lawrence Polls
published
Kenzie Thompson
published
Martha Church
published
Michele Weddle
published
Patricia Dudley
published
Susan Vance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Mangina + Marjo Hull9558% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marjo Hull
129W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
Janet Gallagher
31W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
3.5
Marne Albracht
52W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
4
Cynthia Reyes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Sally Mangina
127W–117L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Marie Allman
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ann Habeger
89W–85L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 1 line in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Barbara Johns
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Edna Swart
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Farzaneh Kia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Lawrence Polls
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenzie Thompson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Church
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Dudley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Vance
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.