Teams

CBRC-Samuel

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-10vs PC-Get Em Done In TwoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Nguyen / Aleksey Ovchinnikov vs Jim Perry / Carrie Perry3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Titechko / Nikolla Qafoku vs Maritess Haynie / Ryan Lieberman1-6, 3-6
2021-10-09vs CBRC-Team JoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Titechko / Adam Hrebeniuk vs Jack Wang / Jody Davey0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Nguyen / Aleksey Ovchinnikov vs Karen Tomerlin / James Kirkham6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-09vs IND-FitzgeraldLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Nguyen / Aleksey Ovchinnikov vs Bryce Borland / Tiffany Sauer3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Titechko / Adam Hrebeniuk vs Peter Ho / Alyssa Fitzgerald2-6, 6-7
2021-10-08vs YTC-StephenLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiana Titechko / Adam Hrebeniuk vs Stacy Stephen / Timothy Miller4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Nguyen / Todd Samuel vs Gena Franklin / Danny Anslinger5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC-Get Em Done In Two401116103
2IND-Fitzgerald3193995
3CBRC-Team Jo226615113
4CBRC-Samuel0401224147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Janel Bhattacharya
published
3.88
Adam Hrebeniuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Amy Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Diana Titechko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Aleksey Ovchinnikov
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Nikolla Qafoku
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Dana Holle
published 4
3.19
Evan Mehlenbacher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Todd Samuel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Holle + Adam Hrebeniuk2344% gamesnot enough data
Adam Hrebeniuk + Diana Titechko134 matchesnot enough data
Adam Hrebeniuk + Amy Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Nguyen + Aleksey Ovchinnikov033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janel Bhattacharya
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Adam Hrebeniuk
87W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Amy Nguyen
67W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Diana Titechko
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Aleksey Ovchinnikov
29W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Nikolla Qafoku
32W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Dana Holle
38W–58L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Evan Mehlenbacher
62W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
0
Todd Samuel
84W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.