Teams

Schenk 7.0

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.39 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-18vs Hulse's HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorraine Baker / Sue Hunter vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Eli Griffin6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBonnie Peterson / Melanie Smith vs Debbie Hall / Rebecca Lanier6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Fuller / Vicki Krogstrand vs Teresa Beebe / Susan Hulse5-7, 3-6
2022-04-15vs Hulse's HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesCollette Bott / Lorraine Baker vs Margo Nef / Michelle Sharp1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTamara Gardner / Ann Schenk vs Debbie Hall / Rebecca Lanier4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSue Hunter / Bonnie Peterson vs Jinny Boozer / Susan Hulse4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-14vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Schenk / Jackie Fuller vs Michelle Sharp / Teresa Beebe4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCollette Bott / Tamara Gardner vs Cyndy Boorman / Lisa Wheeler6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLorraine Baker / Cindy Carr vs Jinny Boozer / Rebecca Lanier4-6, 2-6
2022-04-02vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Smith / Ann Schenk vs Margo Nef / Anne Gaffney6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Peterson / Tamara Gardner vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Eli Griffin2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCollette Bott / Cindy Carr vs Cyndy Boorman / Susan Hulse4-6, 3-6
2022-03-29vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
W#1 DoublesCollette Bott / Lorraine Baker vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Anne Gaffney6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Peterson / Tamara Gardner vs Eli Griffin / Toni Velasquez7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sayer / Vicki Krogstrand vs Cyndy Boorman / Susan Hulse4-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs Hulse's HeroesLost 03
L#1 DoublesVicki Krogstrand / Julie Umphlette vs Toni Velasquez / Margo Nef1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Smith / Bonnie Peterson vs Cyndy Boorman / Lisa Wheeler4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sayer / Ann Schenk vs Debbie Hall / Rebecca Lanier1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-19vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Hunter / Collette Bott vs Margo Nef / Anne Gaffney1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Fuller / Vicki Krogstrand vs Lisa Wheeler / Teresa Beebe1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Umphlette / Ann Schenk vs Eli Griffin / Susan Hulse7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Melanie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.55
Julie Umphlette
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jackie Fuller
published 3.5
3.28
Michelle Sayer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lorraine Baker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Sue Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Collette Bott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Bonnie Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Tamara Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ann Schenk
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cindy Carr
published
Vicki Krogstrand
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Umphlette + Lorraine Baker10262% games+7.7% vs expected
Julie Umphlette + Collette Bott7456% games+5.7% vs expected
Sue Hunter + Bonnie Peterson191354% games+4.6% vs expected
Lorraine Baker + Tamara Gardner11359% games+0.1% vs expected
Tamara Gardner + Collette Bott81745% games−2.0% vs expected
Julie Umphlette + Tamara Gardner5454% games−2.1% vs expected
Lorraine Baker + Collette Bott7747% gamesnot enough data
Ann Schenk + Bonnie Peterson4265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Smith
51W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Julie Umphlette
86W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Jackie Fuller
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Michelle Sayer
47W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Lorraine Baker
72W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Sue Hunter
48W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Collette Bott
66W–91L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Bonnie Peterson
98W–72L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Tamara Gardner
66W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Ann Schenk
69W–85L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Cindy Carr
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicki Krogstrand
113W–84L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.