Teams

DTC

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-11vs RED ROCK CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Brennaman / John Grob vs Robert Campbell / Mister Archedon0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDarin McKinney / Stephen Cereghino vs Thomas Ogawa / Thomas Waite6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Gifford / Richard Hammel vs Craig Slayter / Harry Jacocks0-6, 4-6
2021-06-04vs SPANISH OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesAbsalom Alcaraz / Ted Johnson vs James Santos / Robert Roig1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Cereghino / Michael Miller vs Enrico Litterini / Meynardo Sanchez1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Grob / Richard Hammel vs Jerry Pruitt / Alfredo Sabillo1-6, 0-6
2021-05-21vs RED ROCK CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Cereghino / Michael Miller vs Robert Campbell / Mister Archedon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDarin McKinney / James Wichert vs Shapleigh Mather / Edward Dibble6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAbsalom Alcaraz / Ted Johnson vs Thomas Ogawa / Thomas Waite3-6, 2-6
2021-05-14vs SPANISH OAKSWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Miller / Stephen Cereghino vs Chris Stimson / Louis Baluyut6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDarin McKinney / James Wichert vs Rocky Johnson / Michael Fiscus3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeith Brennaman / John Grob vs Alfredo Sabillo / Joey Sumiller0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-30vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTed Johnson / Gary Miller vs Robert Campbell / JC Cifuentes1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Wichert / Darin McKinney vs Craig Slayter / Thomas Waite6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Grob / Richard Hammel vs Shapleigh Mather / Edward Dibble0-6, 1-6
2021-04-23vs SPANISH OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesAbsalom Alcaraz / Darin McKinney vs Lee Robinson / Enrico Litterini2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRichard Hammel / George Pietro vs Robert Roig / James Santos0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Brennaman / John Grob vs Joey Sumiller / Meynardo Sanchez2-6, 2-6
2021-04-09vs RED ROCK CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarin McKinney / Stephen Cereghino vs Robert Campbell / JC Cifuentes4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Grob / Michael Gifford vs Tom Gillespie / Edward Willett0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTed Johnson / George Pietro vs Shapleigh Mather / Edward Dibble3-6, 2-6
2021-03-26vs SPANISH OAKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesGary Miller / Ted Johnson vs JOHN MacDONALD / Lee Robinson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAbsalom Alcaraz / Darin McKinney vs Rocky Johnson / Dan Hale6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKeith Brennaman / George Pietro vs Robert Roig / Louis Baluyut1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Gary Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Darin McKinney
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.92
Absalom Alcaraz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Keith Brennaman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Stephen Cereghino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
George Pietro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Michael Gifford
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Richard Hammel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ted Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Absalom Alcaraz + Darin McKinney82144% games−2.9% vs expected
Absalom Alcaraz + Stephen Cereghino2744% games−4.0% vs expected
Darin McKinney + Gary Miller153244% games−4.2% vs expected
Keith Brennaman + Stephen Cereghino2836% games−7.9% vs expected
Gary Miller + George Pietro5352% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Cereghino + Darin McKinney1642% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Cereghino + Gary Miller3444% gamesnot enough data
Keith Brennaman + Michael Gifford3346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Miller
105W–149L career · 6 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Darin McKinney
101W–190L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Absalom Alcaraz
59W–90L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Keith Brennaman
72W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Stephen Cereghino
77W–105L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
0%13%87%
2.65
2.5
George Pietro
18W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Gifford
62W–73L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Hammel
7W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ted Johnson
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.