Teams

Mystery team 1

2024 Fall Combo -2 Sundays · 5.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-17vs Mystery team 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesSong Bliss / Blair Robinson vs Allison Burand / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBarbara Jacobs / Erica Jensen vs Kathy McArthur / Yinelkis Rosario6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Xochitl Foster vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-17vs Club MedWon 30
W#1 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Blair Robinson vs Lynn Thomas / Joaquita Martin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSong Bliss / Erica Jensen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesXochitl Foster / Barbara Jacobs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-10vs Mystery team 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Marlene Dodge vs Allison Burand / Aliki Joannides7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Jacobs / Xochitl Foster vs Lori Kaltenbach / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSong Bliss / Blair Robinson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-10vs Club MedWon 21
L#1 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Marlene Dodge vs Laura Foster / Lynn Thomas6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBlair Robinson / Barbara Jacobs vs Dianne Alger / Joaquita Martin6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSong Bliss / Xochitl Foster vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Cecilia Hopper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Barbara Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Song Bliss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Xochitl Foster
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.54
Marlene Dodge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Blair Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecilia Hopper + Song Bliss3256% games+11.4% vs expected
Blair Robinson + Marlene Dodge7454% games+6.3% vs expected
Barbara Jacobs + Song Bliss2640% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecilia Hopper
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Barbara Jacobs
21W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Song Bliss
63W–86L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
2.5
Xochitl Foster
38W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%34%66%
2.56
2.5
Marlene Dodge
33W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%38%62%
2.54
2.5
Blair Robinson
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%57%43%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.