Teams

GOY 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-19vs Linden 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Blythe Murphy vs Maria Linden / Pamela Aikens6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Courtney Jones vs Elia Mavronikolas / Tammy Tao6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Hestenes / Blythe Murphy vs Betsy Hooper / Jennifer Russell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-12vs Manning 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Blythe Murphy vs Jan Whittaker / Cindy Cooke7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.50
Gina Goy
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.37
Blythe Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Linda Hestenes
published
3.31
Thais Warwar
published
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.21
Lucy Callahan
published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.85
Cheryl Rankin
published 3
2.65
Catherine Davis
published 3
Kimberly Lancaster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Cheryl Rankin + Thais Warwar3257% games−1.8% vs expected
Blythe Murphy + Thais Warwar314 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Jen Berlin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Thais Warwar
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Lucy Callahan
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Cheryl Rankin
26W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Catherine Davis
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Kimberly Lancaster
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.