Teams

OC Cabrillo - Stacy

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule16 played
2025-12-12vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinWon 10
W#3 DoublesJenny Inoue / Naomi Sugiura vs Karen Berman / Cristina McLamb6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-12-07vs OC CMTC - Dee - Sun9Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Stacy Tzur vs Rikki Scharnell / Indrani Jackson3-6, 3-6
2025-11-29vs OC Fullerton TC - Lori Sat10amLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Nancy Hirsch vs Shannon Sapp / Pat Dascanio3-6, 6-7
2025-11-23vs OC Cute on the Court - Mak Sun9Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Cathy Jackson vs Theresa Jeong / Rachel Om4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-22vs OC LLW RCI - Bonnie - 12 S/SLost 01
L#2 DoublesCathy Jackson / Terri Rasmussen vs Luna Qingyue Cai / Jenny Tetley3-6, 4-6
2025-11-07vs OC Lifetime San Clemente - KellyLost 01
L#3 DoublesNaomi Sugiura / Yuka Nabangxang vs Michelle Frohlich / Christine Parry5-7, 2-6
2025-11-02vs OC The Huntington Club - JackieLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Haghani / Terri Rasmussen vs Ida Shu / Nancy Shih6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNaomi Sugiura / Linda Marcopulos vs Rosalinda Fazio / Lauren Prelesnik4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHitomi Kawasaki / Arison Hong vs Annie Clark / Jacqueline Jernigan2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesVera Garrard / Shauna Blattner vs Laura Brooks / Maria Solomon7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammy Brusseau / Hitomi Kawasaki vs Terri Hamm / Paula Nishibayashi5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-24vs OC Net Assets LNRC - Gina JWon 10
W#3 DoublesYumiko Tokiwa / Vera Garrard vs Courtney Zani / Elyzabeth Pham6-4, 6-2
2025-10-19vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaLost 03
L#1 DoublesVera Garrard / Kelly Davis vs Sabrina MacLachlan / Michele Savoie5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Cathy Jackson vs Michelle Smith / Jamie Bland1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNaomi Sugiura / Stacy Tzur vs Lindsay Miller / MALU NORTON3-6, 3-6
2025-10-12vs OC Irvine Heritage - Tiffney - Sun11Split 11
W#2 DoublesTammy Brusseau / Terri Rasmussen vs Julie Le / Francesca Ligman6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHitomi Kawasaki / Linda Marcopulos vs Holly Wyler / Tiffney Beckloff5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNaomi Sugiura / Miki Sugiura vs Liz Kirksey / Maili Rood6-4, 6-2
2025-10-03vs OC Coto de Caza - MelissaLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacy Tzur / Kathy Zepeda Emerzian vs Jackie Guthrie / Vicki Hanna3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-28vs OC CMTC - Susie Kim - Sat930Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Jackson / Vera Garrard vs Romi Archer / Daniela Gavaldon4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Michelle Haghani vs Emily McKinney / Susie Kim6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHitomi Kawasaki / Carrie Anderson vs Keiko Jun / Lana Dalley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Tammy Brusseau vs Christine Callas / Lindsay Kimmes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Vera Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.75
Cathy Jackson
published 4
3.73
Terri Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.69
Carrie Anderson
published 4
3.58
Nancy Hirsch
published
3.57
Michelle Haghani
published
3.54
Tammy Brusseau
published
3.54
Jill Muranaka
published
3.48
Stacy Tzur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Hillary Mayne
published
3.35
Arison Hong
published 3.5
3.20
Hitomi Kawasaki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Naomi Sugiura
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.14
Kelly Davis
published
Linda Marcopulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Rasmussen + Cathy Jackson9165% games+2.4% vs expected
Vera Garrard + Cathy Jackson224 matchesnot enough data
Naomi Sugiura + Hitomi Kawasaki033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vera Garrard
110W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Cathy Jackson
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Terri Rasmussen
136W–90L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carrie Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Nancy Hirsch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Tammy Brusseau
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Stacy Tzur
5W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Hillary Mayne
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Arison Hong
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Hitomi Kawasaki
125W–139L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Naomi Sugiura
96W–129L career · 8 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Kelly Davis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Linda Marcopulos
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.