Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Jo - Sat 11

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
W#2 DoublesLisa Rhoads / Lindsay Kimmes vs Sonia Bishop / Laurie Markowitz6-2, 6-1
2025-12-12vs OC Coto de Caza - MelissaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Lacey Seward vs Melissa Brown / Haleigh Crabtree4-6, 1-6
2025-12-11vs OC LNRC - Devon/AmyLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Eveline Gani vs Betty Youndt / Kelly Kehlet6-7, 2-6
2025-12-07vs OC CMTC - Susie Kim - Sat930Won 10
W#3 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Tiffany Pena vs Susie Kim / Tammy Vuong6-3, 6-3
2025-11-08vs OC Cute on the Court - Mak Sun9Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Rhoads / Lindsay Kimmes vs Mina Whitlock / Theresa Jeong1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs Sherry Stone / Michelle Haghani4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-24vs OC YLCC - Holly 11amLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Christine Callas vs Emily Lee / Claudia Spaulding1-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs OC The Huntington Club - JackieWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Christine Callas vs Ida Shu / Lacey Seward4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-17vs OC Lifetime San Clemente - KellyWon 21
L#1 DoublesClaire Hirt / Natalie McDaniel vs Michelle Duenas / Kathy Salter2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Callas / Lisa Rhoads vs Jacquelyn Warbiany / Tracey Fulford7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJosephine Garrett / Shelly Hilliard vs Michelle Frohlich / Marcella Cangelosi7-5, 6-3
2025-10-03vs OC LLW Dana Hills - Dara - 1030Won 10
W#1 DoublesEveline Gani / Lindsay Kimmes vs Dara Luangpraseut / Michelle Espeleta7-5, 6-1
W#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs Elena Salinas / Petra Guzman6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Tiffany Perrucci vs Gigi Farris / Heather Nalle6-1, 6-0
2025-09-26vs OC LLW RCI - Bonnie - 12 S/SWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs Lori McFerren / Nina Berry6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEveline Gani / Lindsay Kimmes vs Susan Umans / Arison Hong6-2, 6-3
2025-09-20vs OC Cabrillo - StacyLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Callas / Lindsay Kimmes vs Terri Rasmussen / Tammy Brusseau6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-12vs OC Irvine Great Park - Nan - 930Won 20
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Lisa Rhoads vs Mary DeVlugt / Athena Wong6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Eveline Gani vs Sa Cool / Sunny Park7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Catherine Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Christine Callas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kelly Lombardo
published
3.64
Cheryl Gates
published 4
3.60
Lindsay Kimmes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.41
Tiffany Perrucci
published
3.37
Lisa Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Karen Brink
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Tiffany Pena
published
3.33
Janna McConnell
published
3.29
Claire Hirt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Natalie McDaniel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Josephine Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Freck
published
Stephanie Buccella
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Gates + Janna McConnell3548% games+9.3% vs expected
Natalie McDaniel + Claire Hirt3545% games−11.6% vs expected
Josephine Garrett + Kelly Lombardo044 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Kimmes + Josephine Garrett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Lombardo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Lindsay Kimmes
40W–45L career · 10 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tiffany Perrucci
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Lisa Rhoads
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Karen Brink
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Tiffany Pena
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Janna McConnell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Claire Hirt
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Natalie McDaniel
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Jenny Freck
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Buccella
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.