Teams

GA 8.5M 18 & Over (Gottenbos)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 8.5 Men (Harrison Tennis Center)

8 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs Team Oliver (CONFIRED)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJustin Thomas / Gerard Dash vs Cameron Seay / Jonathan Ravenelle2-8
W#2 DoublesJ D Prichard / Joseph Wunderle vs Nathaniel Campanile / Ryan Oliver8-4
L#3 DoublesKoen Gottenbos / Marthinus de Wet vs John Nash / Pim Gebuis8-9
2025-08-09vs Team Jackson (CONFIRMED)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Hall / Mark Prygocki vs Alexander Thomson / Gregg Jackson8-4
W#2 DoublesMatthew Dreher / Marthinus de Wet vs Oliver Marcus / Chris Kain8-2
W#3 DoublesJ D Prichard / Gerard Dash vs Mathew Zellner / Bryan Jacobson9-7
2025-08-09vs Team Schmook (CONFIRMED)Won 21
L#1 DoublesDrue Malone / Gerard Dash vs Santiago Robles / Tyler Deese6-8
W#2 DoublesMatthew Dreher / Marthinus de Wet vs Bryan Blaustein / Matthew Buncich8-5
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hall / Joseph Wunderle vs David Knapp / Jay Hirsch8-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men (Harrison Tennis Center) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Drue Malone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Matthew Dreher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Mark Prygocki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Joseph Wunderle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Gerard Dash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
J D Prichard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Koen Gottenbos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Marthinus de Wet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Drue Malone + Koen Gottenbos8360% games+4.5% vs expected
Matthew Dreher + Koen Gottenbos224 matchesnot enough data
J D Prichard + Koen Gottenbos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Drue Malone
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
Matthew Dreher
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
Mark Prygocki
13W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.11
Joseph Wunderle
30W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
Gerard Dash
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
J D Prichard
34W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
Koen Gottenbos
26W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.81
Marthinus de Wet
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.