Teams

Team Jackson (CONFIRMED)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 8.5 Men (Harrison Tennis Center)

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs Team Oliver (CONFIRED)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Thomson / Gregg Jackson vs Cameron Seay / Jonathan Ravenelle8-4
L#2 DoublesMathew Zellner / Luke Hoegger vs Wilson Chira / Scott Burton3-8
L#3 DoublesThomas Orschel / Chris Kain vs Nathaniel Campanile / Kenneth Costner6-8
2025-08-09vs GA 8.5M 18 & Over (Gottenbos)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexander Thomson / Gregg Jackson vs Matthew Hall / Mark Prygocki4-8
L#2 DoublesOliver Marcus / Chris Kain vs Matthew Dreher / Marthinus de Wet2-8
L#3 DoublesMathew Zellner / Bryan Jacobson vs J D Prichard / Gerard Dash7-9
2025-08-09vs Team Schmook (CONFIRMED)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Thomson / Gregg Jackson vs David Knapp / Matt Bentley8-6
L#2 DoublesMathew Zellner / Bryan Jacobson vs Bryan Blaustein / Matthew Buncich3-8
L#3 DoublesOliver Marcus / Chris Kain vs Eric Schmook / Jay Hirsch4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men (Harrison Tennis Center) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Jacob Eastwood
published
4.32
Alexander Thomson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Oliver Marcus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Bryan Jacobson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Chris Kain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Thomas Orschel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Gregg Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Hoegger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mathew Zellner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregg Jackson + Thomas Orschel2348% games+22.2% vs expected
Alexander Thomson + Jacob Eastwood4165% gamesnot enough data
Alexander Thomson + Gregg Jackson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Eastwood
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Alexander Thomson
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Oliver Marcus
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.21
4
Bryan Jacobson
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Chris Kain
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Thomas Orschel
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
Gregg Jackson
45W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Luke Hoegger
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mathew Zellner
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.