Teams

Team Oliver (CONFIRED)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 8.5 Men (Harrison Tennis Center)

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs Team Jackson (CONFIRMED)Won 21
L#1 DoublesCameron Seay / Jonathan Ravenelle vs Alexander Thomson / Gregg Jackson4-8
W#2 DoublesWilson Chira / Scott Burton vs Mathew Zellner / Luke Hoegger8-3
W#3 DoublesNathaniel Campanile / Kenneth Costner vs Thomas Orschel / Chris Kain8-6
2025-08-09vs GA 8.5M 18 & Over (Gottenbos)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCameron Seay / Jonathan Ravenelle vs Justin Thomas / Gerard Dash8-2
L#2 DoublesNathaniel Campanile / Ryan Oliver vs J D Prichard / Joseph Wunderle4-8
W#3 DoublesJohn Nash / Pim Gebuis vs Koen Gottenbos / Marthinus de Wet9-8
2025-08-09vs Team Schmook (CONFIRMED)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Nash / Pim Gebuis vs Santiago Robles / Tyler Deese8-1
L#2 DoublesWilson Chira / Scott Burton vs Bryan Blaustein / Matthew Buncich8-9
L#3 DoublesCameron Seay / Kenneth Costner vs Eric Schmook / Matt Bentley4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.5 Men (Harrison Tennis Center)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GA 8.5M 18 & Over (Gottenbos)2163351
2Team Oliver (CONFIRED)2154453
3Team Schmook (CONFIRMED)2154457
4Team Jackson (CONFIRMED)0327767

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Cameron Seay
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Wilson Chira
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Pim Gebuis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Ryan Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Jonathan Ravenelle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Scott Burton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Kenneth Costner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Nash
published
Nathaniel Campanile
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wilson Chira + Scott Burton2446% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron Seay
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Wilson Chira
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Pim Gebuis
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
4.10
Ryan Oliver
44W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Jonathan Ravenelle
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Scott Burton
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Kenneth Costner
23W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
John Nash
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathaniel Campanile
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.