Teams

OC Mesa Verde CC - Jenna

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-12vs OC Palisades - Hellene - Sat 130Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Orris / Jenna van der Meyden vs Shelley Vrungos / Colleen Scanlon6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Teresa Chow vs Jane Tran / Stephanie Chung6-3, 2-0
2024-09-28vs OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen Sun11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Gretchen Knell vs Demi Dang / Chloe Kishel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Gretchen Knell vs Takiko Phinizy / Chi Rauen6-4, 6-2
2024-08-04vs OC RCI - Michelle/Ly Sat 1230Won 10
W#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Julie Orris vs Susie Hunnel / Miho Mori6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-21vs OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen Sun11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Teresa Chow vs Kristina Ebon / Demi Dang6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Julie Orris
published
4.22
Jenna van der Meyden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Laura Brooks
published
3.80
Aimee Boyles
published 4
3.72
Mary Thomas
published
3.58
Nancy Hirsch
published
3.54
Jill Muranaka
published
Alicia Nofts
published 3.5
Julie Corrigan
published
Karla Micalizzi
published
Linda Marcopulos
published
Megan MacIas
published
Rebecca Gottlieb
published
Teresa Chow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Brooks + Aimee Boyles3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Orris
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
4.46
4.5
Jenna van der Meyden
78W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Laura Brooks
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Aimee Boyles
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Mary Thomas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Nancy Hirsch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.58
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Alicia Nofts
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Corrigan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karla Micalizzi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Marcopulos
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan MacIas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Gottlieb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Chow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.