Teams

OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen Sun11

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

13 players · average NTRP 4.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-19vs OC Palisades - Hellene - Sat 130Won 10
W#3 DoublesSomin Lee / Serena Tseng vs Leslie Lindahl / Karen Brink6-2, 6-1
2024-09-01vs OC Palisades - Hellene - Sat 130Won 10
W#3 DoublesSerena Tseng / Veronika Zherdeva vs Lori Ratzlaff / Elizabeth Hogan6-2, 6-1
2024-08-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesSerena Tseng / Kim Ngo vs Amy Hicks / Stacey Choi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTammy Nguyen / Serena Tseng vs Naomi Sugiura / Hitomi Kawasaki7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Connie Yoo
published 5
4.52
Kristina Ebon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.49
Lauren Nicole Finke
published
4.23
Mina Whitlock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Marjorie Buss
published
4.19
Demi Dang
published 4.5
4.15
Eunice Han
published
4.13
Chloe Kishel
published 4.5
4.04
Vandana Kadiamada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.57
Serena Tseng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Gia Bao Le
published
3.38
Veronika Zherdeva
published
Kim Ngo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vandana Kadiamada + Mina Whitlock404 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Ebon + Lauren Nicole Finke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connie Yoo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.65
5
Kristina Ebon
133W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
Lauren Nicole Finke
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Marjorie Buss
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Demi Dang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Eunice Han
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Chloe Kishel
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Vandana Kadiamada
49W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Serena Tseng
54W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Veronika Zherdeva
23W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kim Ngo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.