Teams

Team 3 Racqueteers 3.0

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-05vs Team 9Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdnan Karimi / Daniel Aronowitz vs Anil Khanna / Arjun Choubey6-2, 5-6
2023-02-18vs Team 2 Serve-AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Geyer / Sameer Farah vs Eric Hopkins / Tim Bowes0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Christopher Young6-2, 5-5
L#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Keith Wojciech vs John Sagen / Perry Zettersten5-7, 5-3
2023-02-04vs Team 10Won 20
W#1 SinglesDaniel Aronowitz vs Stuart Sears6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Christopher Geyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-25Won 20
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Brian Lenihan6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Keith Wojciech vs Mark Neely / Austin Smythe6-1, 6-6, 1-0
2023-01-22vs Team 8 Unstrung HeroesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs James Robberstad6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Christopher Geyer vs David Schnedar / Rob Wright0-6, 1-6
2023-01-13vs Team 5 Courtmasters (3.0)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Adnan Karimi vs Alberto Zapata / Ilya Shapiro2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-01-04vs Team 6 RBGCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeith Wojciech / Daniel Aronowitz vs James Colucci / Mario Levine2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Mel Wesley1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Geyer / Sameer Farah vs Peter Clyne / Allen Amir Parvizian1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Adnan Karimi
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.78
Luan Nguyen
published
Daniel Aronowitz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Sameer Farah
published
2.67
Christopher Geyer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Chuck Lutes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Keith Wojciech
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chuck Lutes + Christopher Geyer2444% gamesnot enough data
Adnan Karimi + Sameer Farah123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adnan Karimi
119W–128L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Luan Nguyen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Daniel Aronowitz
43W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sameer Farah
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Christopher Geyer
20W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Chuck Lutes
14W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.48
Keith Wojciech
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.