Teams

Team 6 RBGCC

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Tolley / Mel Wesley vs Mark Neely / Austin Smythe6-2, 6-1
2023-02-15vs Team 8 Unstrung HeroesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMario Levine / Mel Wesley vs Rob Wright / Majed Hamawy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Colucci / Emil Valle vs Gary Lawson / David Schnedar6-4, 6-3
2023-02-08vs Team 1Won 20
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Mario Levine vs Chandler Fox / Matthew Plishker6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDamon Griggs / Emil Valle vs Randy Lee / Thomas Zavilla7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-01vs Team 9Won 20
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Desmond LaMar6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllen Amir Parvizian / Emil Valle vs Robert Wilson / Ted Berner6-3, 6-4
2023-01-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmil Valle / John DeMoors vs John Sparks / David Beckel7-5, 6-4
2023-01-18vs Team 5 Courtmasters (3.0)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Mario Levine vs Robert Chang / Simon Storm6-4, 6-4
2023-01-11vs Team 2 Serve-AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Mario Levine vs Tim Bowes / Stephen Spizuoco6-2, 6-2
2023-01-04vs Team 3 Racqueteers 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Adnan Karimi6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
2.82
David Tolley
published 3
2.81
James Colucci
published
2.77
Emil Valle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
John DeMoors
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emil Valle + Mel Wesley9459% gamesnot enough data
Mel Wesley + Mario Levine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
David Tolley
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Emil Valle
52W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.