Teams

Team 5 Courtmasters (3.0)

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesSimon Storm / Ilya Shapiro vs Jay Caputo / Christopher Young7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-11vs Team 8 Unstrung HeroesLost 02
L#1 DoublesNatee Wongsangpaiboon / Simon Storm vs Kurt Schinnerer / Majed Hamawy7-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Parks / Robert Chang vs Paul Reid / Robert Smith3-6, 3-6
2023-02-28vs Team 7Won 10
W#2 DoublesSimon Storm / Alberto Zapata vs Robert Youree / Martin Weber6-1, 6-3
2023-02-20vs Team 9Won 10
W#2 DoublesSimon Storm / David Parks vs Arjun Choubey / Ted Berner6-1, 6-3
2023-02-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTHUC NGUYEN vs Alexander Sears1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-18vs Team 6 RBGCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Chang / Simon Storm vs Mel Wesley / Mario Levine4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTHUC NGUYEN vs David Tolley6-2, 6-2
2023-01-13vs Team 3 Racqueteers 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesTHUC NGUYEN / Frank Pan vs Juan Salazar / Sameer Farah7-5, 6-5
2023-01-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesFrank Pan / THUC NGUYEN vs Levi Thomas / Rodolfo Pigalarga6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Parks / Robert Chang vs Brent Gurney / Vincent Sedwick2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

THUC NGUYEN
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Simon Storm
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
3.08
David Parks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Frank Pan
published
2.97
Ilya Shapiro
published
2.83
Tyler Duvall
published
2.73
Andrew Tsai
published 3
2.64
Alberto Zapata
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Parks + Simon Storm9271% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
THUC NGUYEN
45W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Simon Storm
75W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Natee Wongsangpaiboon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
David Parks
76W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
Frank Pan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Ilya Shapiro
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Tyler Duvall
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Andrew Tsai
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alberto Zapata
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.