Teams

MSA 55+ (Mas Serve Aces)

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-10vs Old FaultersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCameron Lumsden / Russell Sauer vs David Orr / Raymond Otto7-5, 7-5
2025-07-03vs Carl's BoysLost 01
L#2 DoublesRussell Sauer / Bryan Dingel vs Bob Lopez / Francisco Limbago2-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs BRSC BangersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRussell Sauer / Charles Novak vs Bruce Goslovich / Russell Moorhead1-6, 0-6
2025-06-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRussell Sauer / Kevin Maloney vs Steven Garcia / Dit Dudley4-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs One more tryLost 01
L#1 DoublesRussell Sauer / Cameron Lumsden vs Karl Baughman / Dean Reich1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Carl's Boys8017716163
2One more try6217719191
3BRSC Bangers35121228199
4Old Faulters2691535250
5MSA 55+ (Mas Serve Aces)1751941263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Gordon Jones
published 4.5
4.05
Paul Thornton
published 4.5
3.62
Jason Adkins
published 4
3.56
Bryan Dingel
published 4
3.40
John Rosellini
published 3.5
3.35
Kevin Maloney
published 3.5
3.35
Cameron Lumsden
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Hermes
published 3.5
3.31
Charles Novak
published 3.5
3.29
Mike Cooley
published 3.5
Russell Sauer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hermes + Jason Adkins6546% games−2.5% vs expected
Michael Hermes + Mike Cooley91549% games−2.9% vs expected
John Rosellini + Russell Sauer4643% gamesnot enough data
John Rosellini + Cameron Lumsden6257% gamesnot enough data
Charles Novak + Russell Sauer044 matchesnot enough data
Mike Cooley + Jason Adkins044 matchesnot enough data
Mike Cooley + Kevin Maloney134 matchesnot enough data
Mike Cooley + Cameron Lumsden224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gordon Jones
30W–17L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Paul Thornton
38W–25L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Jason Adkins
92W–75L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Bryan Dingel
105W–134L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
John Rosellini
85W–82L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Kevin Maloney
51W–50L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Cameron Lumsden
34W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Michael Hermes
57W–107L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Charles Novak
26W–53L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Mike Cooley
62W–121L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Russell Sauer
22W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.