Teams

UPTA40C/Rood/Cardinal

2026 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 9:00 AM
Butler Springs Park
Sep 17 9:00 AM
Cardinal Racquet Club
Sep 24 9:00 AM
Cardinal Racquet Club
Oct 1 9:00 AM
Cardinal Racquet Club
Oct 8 9:00 AM
Butler Springs Park
2026-09-03vs UPTA40C/Blinston/Hwy14Won 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Drennon / Caroline Carter vs Celeste Blinston / Joan Smith5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAndrea Murillo / Christi Silverstein vs Jennifer Smith / Sandy Weston5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Malone / Sara Mower vs Beth Ouellette / Tressa Jordan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-20vs UPTA40C/Weiner/KrocLost 03
L#1 DoublesBritanny A ROOD / Andrea Murillo vs Adalis Gutierrez / Debra Guarino4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Etherington / Nancy Lanois vs Rebecca Beeby / Erin Brasington0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKellar Rogers / Caroline Carter vs Francine Holmes / Michelle Frazer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-12vs UPTA40C/Ashmore/KrocLost 12
W#1 DoublesKellar Rogers / Sara Mower vs Ina Cottingham / Kim Tyler6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDenise Malone / Caroline Carter vs Ann Ashmore / Angeline Scheinbaum2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBritanny A ROOD / Andrea Murillo vs Cameron Keriazakos / Holly Smith3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA40C/Clay/Thornblade2051235
2UPTA40C/Blinston/Hwy142042450
3UPTA40C/Weiner/Kroc1030120
4UPTA40C/Hagler/Pavilion1021215
5UPTA40C/Ashmore/Kroc1133761
6UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs0112432
7UPTA40C/Dygert/Cardinal0103637
8UPTA40C/Oshea/GCC02241068
9UPTA40C/Rood/Cardinal02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Carrie Drennon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Renee Yarbrough
published
3.33
Sara Mower
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Christi Silverstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Andrea Murillo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Debbie Etherington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kellar Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Denise Malone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Kimberly Pearigen
published
3.08
Britanny A ROOD
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Nancy Lanois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Kyra Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Murillo + Kellar Rogers10557% games+9.7% vs expected
Kimberly Pearigen + Kellar Rogers5256% games+5.0% vs expected
Nancy Lanois + Kyra Roberts2350% games+4.3% vs expected
Britanny A ROOD + Andrea Murillo4749% games−1.0% vs expected
Debbie Etherington + Nancy Lanois1439% gamesnot enough data
Kyra Roberts + Andrea Murillo314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Etherington + Sara Mower303 matchesnot enough data
Sara Mower + Denise Malone303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Drennon
20W–15L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Renee Yarbrough
25W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Sara Mower
29W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Christi Silverstein
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrea Murillo
39W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Debbie Etherington
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Kellar Rogers
45W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Denise Malone
16W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Kimberly Pearigen
34W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
3.5
Britanny A ROOD
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Nancy Lanois
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kyra Roberts
17W–25L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.