Teams

UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs

2026 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 9:00 AM
Greenville Country Club
Sep 17 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Laura McNeel
Sep 24 9:00 AM
Butler Springs Park
Oct 1 9:00 AM
The Salvation Army Kroc Tennis Center
Oct 8 9:00 AM
Butler Springs Park
2026-09-03vs UPTA40C/Dygert/CardinalWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Matricciani / Austin Clay vs Tonya Mouzon / Mary Jo Clarkson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGera Mort / Melissa Middleton vs Sissa Sullivan / Tari Dygert4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTamarah Hagen / Laura McNeel vs Jennifer Watson / Jackie Walker6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA40C/Clay/Thornblade2051235
2UPTA40C/Blinston/Hwy142042450
3UPTA40C/Weiner/Kroc1030120
4UPTA40C/Hagler/Pavilion1021215
5UPTA40C/Ashmore/Kroc1133761
6UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs0112432
7UPTA40C/Dygert/Cardinal0103637
8UPTA40C/Oshea/GCC02241068
9UPTA40C/Rood/Cardinal02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Janet Matricciani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Carol Rabel
published 4
3.43
Laura Eller
published
3.38
Austin Clay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Tamarah Hagen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Greta Harper
published
3.26
Gera Mort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Melissa Middleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Laura McNeel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jeannie Roberts
published
3.08
Natilee Falk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McNeel + Jeannie Roberts91049% games−4.3% vs expected
Melissa Middleton + Jeannie Roberts4160% gamesnot enough data
Laura Eller + Jeannie Roberts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Matricciani
27W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Carol Rabel
39W–33L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Laura Eller
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Austin Clay
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tamarah Hagen
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.34
Greta Harper
40W–54L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Gera Mort
18W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Melissa Middleton
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Laura McNeel
36W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jeannie Roberts
33W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Natilee Falk
20W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.