Teams

UPTA40C/Hagler/Pavilion

2026 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 17 9:00 AM
Spaulding Farm Community Tennis Courts
Sep 24 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Sandra HaglerRhonda Fischer
Oct 1 9:00 AM
Thornblade Club
Oct 8 9:00 AM
Cardinal Racquet Club
2026-09-04vs UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler SpringsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandra Hagler / Katie Saad vs Janet Matricciani / Jill Curran6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Burnette / Andrea Scoggins vs Laura Eller / Natilee Falk7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Dreiding / Michelle Scott vs Carol Rabel / Austin Clay3-6, 6-7
2026-09-03vs UPTA40C/Weiner/KrocLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Koubek / Melissa Coles vs Adalis Gutierrez / Brooke Miller2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKirby King / Charity Richards vs Joyce Weiner / Kathleen Ryan6-3
W#3 DoublesVera McCray / Naomi Kozawa vs Erin Brasington / Heather Gunter6-2, 6-4
2026-08-27vs UPTA40C/Ashmore/KrocLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Burnette / Alexandra Mendoza vs LINDSAY KAPLAN / Abigail Bliss7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMonika Franz / Michelle Scott vs Cameron Keriazakos / Shelley Bauer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Haas / Julie Branham vs Karen Makepeace / Taya Kretz-Notelle7-6, 7-5
2026-08-13vs UPTA40C/Oshea/GCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Haas / Monika Franz vs Ali Hill / Liliana McGee3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNaomi Kozawa / Vera McCray vs Jamie Womack / Catherine Wrenn Gibellino6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKirby King / Jennifer Tuttle vs Tracy O'Shea / Lindsey Batavia6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA40C/Clay/Thornblade2051235
2UPTA40C/Blinston/Hwy142042450
3UPTA40C/Weiner/Kroc1030120
4UPTA40C/Hagler/Pavilion1021215
5UPTA40C/Ashmore/Kroc1133761
6UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs0112432
7UPTA40C/Dygert/Cardinal0103637
8UPTA40C/Oshea/GCC02241068
9UPTA40C/Rood/Cardinal02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kirby King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Jane Koubek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Vera McCray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Christina Burnette
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Sandra Hagler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Rebecca Haas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Nancy Dreiding
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Jennifer Tuttle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Julie Branham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Melissa Coles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Monika Franz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Naomi Kozawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Charity Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Katie Saad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Andrea Scoggins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Carlynn Eisner
published 3.5
Rhonda Fischer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Branham + Sandra Hagler6063% games+13.0% vs expected
Vera McCray + Kirby King10465% games+3.1% vs expected
Jane Koubek + Rebecca Haas3250% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Coles + Jane Koubek224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Koubek + Sandra Hagler224 matchesnot enough data
Christina Burnette + Sandra Hagler404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Tuttle + Rebecca Haas314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Branham + Rebecca Haas224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirby King
38W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Jane Koubek
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Vera McCray
38W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Burnette
38W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Sandra Hagler
51W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Rebecca Haas
41W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
Nancy Dreiding
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Tuttle
31W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Julie Branham
51W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Monika Franz
34W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
Naomi Kozawa
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Charity Richards
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Katie Saad
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrea Scoggins
17W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carlynn Eisner
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Rhonda Fischer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.