Teams

CPV NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-13vs PRKR REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristine Thelen / Andrea Smart vs Judy Mohr / Elaine Tyson6-1, 6-3
2024-06-06vs SS-H GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Boerema / Emily Dreyer vs Linda Backus / Sandra Brock6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Smart / Betsy Heggie vs Carole LaBounty / Irene Scott4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-30vs HRCA-N BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Boerema / Karen Lang vs Kathy Breth / Nancy Hong7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBetsy Heggie / Christine Thelen vs Ann Reidy / Carol Manlove1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-23vs PRC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Boerema / Andrea Smart vs Heather Marks / Janice Nelson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-16vs RRTC GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Boerema / Karen Lang vs Pam Ammann / Donna Lance7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetsy Heggie / Andrea Smart vs Melissa Cabeceiras / Kathy Piquette6-2, 6-3
2024-05-09vs PRKR REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Boerema / Emily Dreyer vs Toni Payne / Darlene Odean6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Skinner / Betsy Heggie vs Beth Laverenz / Joanne Geiss4-6, 2-6
2024-05-02vs SS-H GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Boerema / Jill Skinner vs Carole LaBounty / Kari Graham7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Heggie / Andrea Smart vs Nanci Cheberenchick / Linda Backus6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Susan Boerema
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Andrea Smart
published 3
2.74
Jill Skinner
published
2.73
Betsy Heggie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.53
Christine Thelen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Lisa Berlin
published
Emily Dreyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Smart + Betsy Heggie6653% games+2.1% vs expected
Christine Thelen + Betsy Heggie4554% gamesnot enough data
Jill Skinner + Betsy Heggie4247% gamesnot enough data
Susan Boerema + Andrea Smart314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Susan Boerema
173W–114L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Andrea Smart
40W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Jill Skinner
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Betsy Heggie
72W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Christine Thelen
50W–40L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Lisa Berlin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Emily Dreyer
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.