Teams

PRKR RED

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-13vs CPV NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarlene Odean / Beth Laverenz vs Lisa Berlin / Jill Skinner6-2, 2-0
2024-05-30vs PRC ORANGESplit 11
W#2 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Cindi Turchik vs Amy Walsh / Candace Sotwick7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarlene Odean / Judy Mohr vs Sharon Kisch / Teresa Crystal4-6, 1-6
2024-05-16vs SS-H GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJoanne Geiss / Beth Laverenz vs Lynn Gifford / Rosemarie Kucharski4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarlene Odean / Toni Payne vs Kari Graham / Linda Backus5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-09vs CPV NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesToni Payne / Darlene Odean vs Susan Boerema / Emily Dreyer1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Joanne Geiss vs Jill Skinner / Betsy Heggie6-4, 6-2
2024-05-02vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesDarlene Odean / Elaine Tyson vs Jennifer Schum / Vicki Sullivan4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAura Leigh Ferguson / Beth Laverenz vs Barbara Adamson / Carol Manlove3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindi Turchik
published 3
2.58
Beth Laverenz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Darlene Odean
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Aura Leigh Ferguson
published 2.5
Elaine Tyson
published
Joanne Geiss
published
Judy Mohr
published
Theresa Murray
published
Toni Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darlene Odean + Beth Laverenz111251% games−0.4% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Toni Payne7263% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Geiss + Beth Laverenz213 matchesnot enough data
Judy Mohr + Elaine Tyson033 matchesnot enough data
Beth Laverenz + Cindi Turchik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindi Turchik
14W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Beth Laverenz
57W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Darlene Odean
85W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Aura Leigh Ferguson
1W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elaine Tyson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joanne Geiss
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Judy Mohr
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Theresa Murray
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Toni Payne
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.