Teams

SS-H GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-13vs PRC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesNanci Cheberenchick / Kari Graham vs Sharon Kisch / Celeste Gardner6-3, 7-6
2024-06-06vs CPV NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarole LaBounty / Irene Scott vs Andrea Smart / Betsy Heggie6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-30vs RRTC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Brock / Kari Graham vs Melissa Cabeceiras / Maria Orton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Lynn Gifford vs Tammy Holder / Donna Lance5-7, 1-6
2024-05-23vs HRCA-N BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Graham / Linda Backus vs Kathy Breth / Nancy Sharpe4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Scott / Carole LaBounty vs Robyn Jensen / Patricia Edwards2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNanci Cheberenchick / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Vicki Sullivan / Jennifer Schum3-6, 3-6
2024-05-16vs PRKR REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesIrene Scott / Carole LaBounty vs Theresa Murray / Cindi Turchik6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLynn Gifford / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Joanne Geiss / Beth Laverenz6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKari Graham / Linda Backus vs Darlene Odean / Toni Payne7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-09vs PRC ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesIrene Scott / Carole LaBounty vs Vicky M Martin / Lori Lee1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-02vs CPV NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarole LaBounty / Kari Graham vs Susan Boerema / Jill Skinner6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Carole LaBounty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Rosemarie Kucharski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Kari Graham
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Irene Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ann Koets
published 2.5
Linda Backus
published
Lynn Gifford
published
Nanci Cheberenchick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Scott + Carole LaBounty6649% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Gifford + Ann Koets123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carole LaBounty
56W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Rosemarie Kucharski
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Kari Graham
95W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Irene Scott
55W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Ann Koets
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Backus
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Gifford
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nanci Cheberenchick
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.