Teams

EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-04Won 10
W#3 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs Andrew Dsouza6-2, 6-1
2024-08-01vs RZamudio (Col Beatty)Won 20
W#2 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs Dean Brown6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJeremy Rhoten vs Ross Berger6-1, 6-1
2024-07-25vs MThompson (Windyrush)Won 10
W#3 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs Sarat Mishra6-2, 6-1
2024-07-23vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs Andrew Lawler6-1, 6-0
2024-07-11vs GEstrada (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJeremy Rhoten vs Ivan Blakeney6-7, 1-6
2024-06-20vs WLewis (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJeremy Rhoten vs Will Lewis III6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnthony Bertucci vs Gregory Vlahos7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs David Maloney6-3, 6-0
2024-05-30vs DDemaine (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs Devon DeMaine2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJeremy Rhoten vs Cameron Lober6-7, 3-6
2024-05-23vs MJarzynski (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 SinglesDavid Shevsky vs Bashaar El Fasid6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJeremy Rhoten vs Michal Jarzynski2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
David Shevsky
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Anthony Bertucci
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jeremy Rhoten
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Eric Weinbrenner
published
3.27
Singh B Dhillon
published
3.21
Paul Sercer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Bertucci + David Shevsky5160% gamesnot enough data
Jeremy Rhoten + David Shevsky2353% gamesnot enough data
Paul Sercer + Jeremy Rhoten314 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Bertucci + Jeremy Rhoten134 matchesnot enough data
Eric Weinbrenner + David Shevsky404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Shevsky
118W–37L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.69
3.5
Anthony Bertucci
53W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Jeremy Rhoten
48W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.35
Eric Weinbrenner
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
Singh B Dhillon
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Paul Sercer
38W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.