GNO RED
2021 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings71 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1SSLT TEAL | 7 | 0 | 7 | 117 |
| 2NJ GREEN | 7 | 0 | 8 | 94 |
| 3SKY RED | 7 | 0 | 9 | 125 |
| 4PTC RED | 7 | 0 | 10 | 116 |
| 5RCC BLUE | 6 | 0 | 4 | 66 |
| 6KC GOLD | 6 | 0 | 11 | 110 |
| 7SSHP GREEN | 6 | 1 | 7 | 101 |
| 8SKY BLUE | 6 | 1 | 13 | 142 |
| 9PH BLUE | 6 | 1 | 13 | 121 |
| 10WC RED | 6 | 1 | 14 | 150 |
| 11LAC BLUE | 6 | 1 | 15 | 142 |
| 12VCC SILVER | 6 | 1 | 17 | 170 |
| 13HIW RED | 5 | 1 | 13 | 140 |
| 14NJ PURPLE | 5 | 1 | 14 | 132 |
| 15RHCC RED | 5 | 1 | 15 | 141 |
| 16KC RED | 5 | 2 | 14 | 122 |
| 17SSLT BLUE | 5 | 2 | 15 | 154 |
| 18PH TEAL | 5 | 2 | 15 | 137 |
| 19TTA BLUE | 5 | 2 | 17 | 150 |
| 20BRMST BLUE | 5 | 2 | 18 | 141 |
| 21LEBTC TEAL | 5 | 2 | 18 | 169 |
| 22DTC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 19 | 158 |
| 23PRC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 19 | 157 |
| 24HW RED | 5 | 2 | 20 | 162 |
| 25BM RED | 5 | 2 | 21 | 173 |
| 26NJ ORANGE | 4 | 2 | 13 | 106 |
| 27MEA GOLD | 4 | 2 | 15 | 149 |
| 28SV RED | 4 | 3 | 18 | 144 |
| 29SSH ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 19 | 175 |
| 30SSH BLUE | 4 | 3 | 20 | 161 |
| 31HV GREEN | 4 | 3 | 21 | 164 |
| 32BCST RED | 4 | 3 | 23 | 165 |
| 33PCC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 23 | 184 |
| 34SSD BLUE | 4 | 3 | 24 | 186 |
| 35LEBTC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 25 | 195 |
| 36BM BLUE | 4 | 3 | 27 | 197 |
| 37BRMST NAVY | 3 | 3 | 21 | 166 |
| 38EM GREEN | 3 | 4 | 21 | 184 |
| 39EM NAVY | 3 | 4 | 23 | 180 |
| 40WC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 24 | 194 |
| 41WP NAVY | 3 | 4 | 25 | 196 |
| 42HFII RED | 3 | 4 | 25 | 172 |
| 43LTFC RED | 3 | 4 | 26 | 202 |
| 44WP BLUE | 3 | 4 | 27 | 202 |
| 45CPV BLUE | 3 | 4 | 27 | 195 |
| 46GNO RED | 3 | 4 | 27 | 205 |
| 47BCST BLUE | 3 | 4 | 29 | 219 |
| 48MVCC RED | 2 | 4 | 19 | 161 |
| 49BP RED | 2 | 4 | 21 | 142 |
| 50VCC TEAL | 2 | 5 | 23 | 173 |
| 51HV RED | 2 | 5 | 26 | 194 |
| 52CVTA RED | 2 | 5 | 27 | 185 |
| 53LEBTC PINK | 2 | 5 | 28 | 201 |
| 54CCV GREEN | 2 | 5 | 29 | 205 |
| 55HG RED | 2 | 5 | 32 | 223 |
| 56SH RED | 2 | 5 | 33 | 221 |
| 57CM BLUE | 2 | 5 | 35 | 216 |
| 58LPTC TEAL | 1 | 5 | 26 | 199 |
| 59NJ PINK | 1 | 5 | 28 | 184 |
| 60HW PINK | 1 | 6 | 30 | 203 |
| 61CCV BLUE | 1 | 6 | 31 | 211 |
| 62TTA PINK | 0 | 6 | 32 | 195 |
| 63HIW NAVY | 0 | 6 | 32 | 198 |
| 64NJ NAVY | 0 | 6 | 33 | 214 |
| 65GCC BLUE | 0 | 7 | 32 | 217 |
| 66SSH YELLOW | 0 | 7 | 35 | 221 |
| 67CCV YELLOW | 0 | 7 | 37 | 228 |
| 68HRCA GREEN | 0 | 7 | 38 | 231 |
| 69BM GREEN | 0 | 7 | 38 | 235 |
| 70EM SILVER | 0 | 7 | 38 | 239 |
| 71MEA PURPLE | 0 | 7 | 42 | 246 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Meg Braun + Lauren Hillary | 13–6 | 63% games | +5.9% vs expected |
| Taylor Surroz + Meg Braun | 19–8 | 55% games | +3.5% vs expected |
| Lauren Turra + Jennifer Delaney | 9–12 | 48% games | +2.0% vs expected |
| Lisa Heichel + Tonya Fallows | 7–20 | 42% games | −0.1% vs expected |
| Meg Braun + Jennifer Delaney | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Lisa Heichel + Lauren Turra | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Tonya Fallows + Lauren Turra | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Tonya Fallows + Jennifer Delaney | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.