Teams

NJ ORANGE

2021 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-21vs LPTC TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Rose Wilder / Susan Tomlinson vs Rebecca BaanHofman / Casey Tatum6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Bock vs Tina Atchley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Colvin / Laura Kelly vs Neha Arora / Ashwini Pillai6-1, 6-0
2021-07-14vs RHCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Rose Wilder / Janet Colvin vs Terri Whitehair / Marcy Garramone3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Tomlinson vs Abbey Wood4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Kelly / Sara Quackenbush vs Melissa Argenti / Liz Mercado6-0, 6-2
2021-07-07vs HIW NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Colvin / Laura Kelly vs Brenda Park / Wendy Turman6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Bock vs Carrie DiCanio6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Parris / Susan Tomlinson vs Elan Lantz / Kendra Bowman6-1, 6-2
2021-06-30vs KC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Kelly / Margaret Parris vs Rachel Osborne / Annie Packard1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Rose Wilder vs Kelly Fisher7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Colvin / Susan Tomlinson vs Katie Colley / Ruth Wilken6-2, 6-1
2021-06-23vs NJ PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Rose Wilder / Susan Tomlinson vs Deena Green / Ingrid Palmer6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Bock vs Maile Inagaki6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Colvin / Margaret Parris vs Karen Kirby / Kristy Matteson2-6, 4-6
2021-06-09vs MVCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheila O'Neill / Mary Rose Wilder vs Kristin Mazzarese / Stacey Jones6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Bock vs Mary Elizabeth Frederick6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Parris / Laura Kelly vs JULIE Danielson / Molly Nelson6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings71 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSLT TEAL701837117
2NJ GREEN70174894
3SKY RED701749125
4PTC RED7017410116
5RCC BLUE60162466
6KC GOLD6014411110
7SSHP GREEN611837101
8SKY BLUE6115613142
9PH BLUE6116513121
10WC RED6116514150
11LAC BLUE6116515142
12VCC SILVER6114717170
13HIW RED5113513140
14NJ PURPLE5112614132
15RHCC RED5111715141
16KC RED5214714122
17SSLT BLUE5214715154
18PH TEAL5214715137
19TTA BLUE5214717150
20BRMST BLUE5213818141
21LEBTC TEAL5213818169
22DTC BLUE5213819158
23PRC BLUE5213819157
24HW RED5212920162
25BM RED52111021173
26NJ ORANGE4212613106
27MEA GOLD4211715149
28SV RED4312918144
29SSH ORANGE4312919175
30SSH BLUE4312920161
31HV GREEN43111021164
32BCST RED43101123165
33PCC BLUE43111023184
34SSD BLUE43111024186
35LEBTC BLUE43101125195
36BM BLUE43101127197
37BRMST NAVY339921166
38EM GREEN3412921184
39EM NAVY34101123180
40WC GREEN3491224194
41WP NAVY3491225196
42HFII RED3491225172
43LTFC RED34101126202
44WP BLUE34101127202
45CPV BLUE3491227195
46GNO RED3491227205
47BCST BLUE3481329219
48MVCC RED249919161
49BP RED2481021142
50VCC TEAL25101123173
51HV RED2581326194
52CVTA RED2591227185
53LEBTC PINK2591228201
54CCV GREEN2581329205
55HG RED2561532223
56SH RED2561533221
57CM BLUE2551635216
58LPTC TEAL1561226199
59NJ PINK1551328184
60HW PINK1671430203
61CCV BLUE1661531211
62TTA PINK0631532195
63HIW NAVY0621632198
64NJ NAVY0621633214
65GCC BLUE0751632217
66SSH YELLOW0741735221
67CCV YELLOW0731837228
68HRCA GREEN0731838231
69BM GREEN0721938235
70EM SILVER0721938239
71MEA PURPLE0702142246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Caitlin Bock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
2.83
Mary Rose Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.68
Janet Colvin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.56
Susan Tomlinson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Margaret Parris
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sara Quackenbush
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila O'Neill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Tomlinson + Mary Rose Wilder5255% games+2.7% vs expected
Susan Tomlinson + Janet Colvin4177% gamesnot enough data
Sara Quackenbush + Margaret Parris314 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Parris + Mary Rose Wilder123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Rose Wilder + Janet Colvin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caitlin Bock
108W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Mary Rose Wilder
117W–52L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Janet Colvin
37W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Susan Tomlinson
84W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
2.56
Margaret Parris
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sara Quackenbush
28W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Sheila O'Neill
64W–17L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.