Teams

HIW RED

2021 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-27vs NJ NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharlene Funk / CAROLINE MCQUEEN vs Norma Crockett / Laura Welsh6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Tribby vs Lisa Chase6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSandra Gilbert / Emily Scarbrough vs Amy Stewart / Elizabeth Bravman6-1, 7-6
2021-07-26vs RHCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesCAROLINE MCQUEEN / Julianna Antenucci vs Jessica Tsuo / Lindsey Fleener6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Tribby vs Polly Traylor4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharlene Funk / Emily Scarbrough vs Charlotte Smith / Gretchen Moser6-3, 6-1
2021-07-07vs MC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Tribby / Julianna Antenucci vs Luann Mcclure / Katherine Paganucci6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSandra Gilbert vs Meghan Ciacci3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Scarbrough / Amanda Walker vs Tiffany Cuneo / Janice Fritsch6-2, 6-3
2021-06-30vs KC GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCAROLINE MCQUEEN / Amanda Walker vs Lisa Luong / Nelisha Firestone7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristine Stump vs Christi Hursta2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSharlene Funk / Julianna Antenucci vs Lori Himmel / Karen Markham6-3, 6-1
2021-06-23vs BP REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesCAROLINE MCQUEEN / Julianna Antenucci vs Kelli E Barker / Angela Martin6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Tribby vs Amy Daly5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristine Stump / Emily Scarbrough vs Brandy Echery / Nancy Thompson6-2, 6-3
2021-06-16vs NJ REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCAROLINE MCQUEEN / Kristine Stump vs Amy Kempster / Kristin Walters6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandra Gilbert vs Nicole Cotta2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSharlene Funk / Amanda Walker vs Kathy Campbell / Shannon Hempelman6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings71 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSLT TEAL701837117
2NJ GREEN70174894
3SKY RED701749125
4PTC RED7017410116
5RCC BLUE60162466
6KC GOLD6014411110
7SSHP GREEN611837101
8SKY BLUE6115613142
9PH BLUE6116513121
10WC RED6116514150
11LAC BLUE6116515142
12VCC SILVER6114717170
13HIW RED5113513140
14NJ PURPLE5112614132
15RHCC RED5111715141
16KC RED5214714122
17SSLT BLUE5214715154
18PH TEAL5214715137
19TTA BLUE5214717150
20BRMST BLUE5213818141
21LEBTC TEAL5213818169
22DTC BLUE5213819158
23PRC BLUE5213819157
24HW RED5212920162
25BM RED52111021173
26NJ ORANGE4212613106
27MEA GOLD4211715149
28SV RED4312918144
29SSH ORANGE4312919175
30SSH BLUE4312920161
31HV GREEN43111021164
32BCST RED43101123165
33PCC BLUE43111023184
34SSD BLUE43111024186
35LEBTC BLUE43101125195
36BM BLUE43101127197
37BRMST NAVY339921166
38EM GREEN3412921184
39EM NAVY34101123180
40WC GREEN3491224194
41WP NAVY3491225196
42HFII RED3491225172
43LTFC RED34101126202
44WP BLUE34101127202
45CPV BLUE3491227195
46GNO RED3491227205
47BCST BLUE3481329219
48MVCC RED249919161
49BP RED2481021142
50VCC TEAL25101123173
51HV RED2581326194
52CVTA RED2591227185
53LEBTC PINK2591228201
54CCV GREEN2581329205
55HG RED2561532223
56SH RED2561533221
57CM BLUE2551635216
58LPTC TEAL1561226199
59NJ PINK1551328184
60HW PINK1671430203
61CCV BLUE1661531211
62TTA PINK0631532195
63HIW NAVY0621632198
64NJ NAVY0621633214
65GCC BLUE0751632217
66SSH YELLOW0741735221
67CCV YELLOW0731837228
68HRCA GREEN0731838231
69BM GREEN0721938235
70EM SILVER0721938239
71MEA PURPLE0702142246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Mary Tribby
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Emily Scarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
CAROLINE MCQUEEN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Sharlene Funk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Julianna Antenucci
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kristine Stump
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Gilbert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Tribby + CAROLINE MCQUEEN7552% games+4.6% vs expected
Sharlene Funk + CAROLINE MCQUEEN314 matchesnot enough data
Sharlene Funk + Julianna Antenucci134 matchesnot enough data
Sharlene Funk + Kristine Stump213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Tribby
95W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Emily Scarbrough
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
CAROLINE MCQUEEN
61W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Sharlene Funk
69W–70L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
2.36
Julianna Antenucci
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristine Stump
8W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Gilbert
3W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.