Teams

Glen Eagle - Kraft

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-09vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Won 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Sara Wachs vs Gina Adiutori / MacKenzie Rickman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Kraft vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / Cheryl Cohen vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Dana Wagoner6-7, 3-6
2024-12-02vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Won 20
W#1 DoublesSara Wachs / Stephanie Foley vs MacKenzie Rickman / Gina Adiutori7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Jhanji / Lynn Johns vs Dayna Webre / Nicki Sebold6-4, 6-4
2024-11-18vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cohen / Sara Wachs vs Nicki Sebold / Kari Gustafson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMira Rochford / Nada Pivcevic vs Gina Adiutori / Tara Newhall1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMacKenzie Kraft / Michelle Kraft vs Dayna Webre / MacKenzie Rickman3-6, 1-6
2024-11-11vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Wachs / Stephanie Foley vs Kari Gustafson / Nicki Sebold5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-04vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Won 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Lynn Johns vs Dayna Webre / Tracy Stuben6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMira Rochford / Jane Jhanji vs Nicki Sebold / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTonja Brewer / Renea Tucker vs MacKenzie Rickman / Gina Adiutori4-6, 1-6
2024-10-28vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Lost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Sara Wachs vs Laura Jolly / Dana Wagoner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMacKenzie Kraft vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / Renea Tucker vs Dayna Webre / MacKenzie Rickman2-6, 3-6
2024-10-24vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Jhanji / Carolyn Matje vs MacKenzie Rickman / Dayna Webre4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMacKenzie Kraft vs Gina Adiutori2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / Tonja Brewer vs Nicki Sebold / Tracy Stuben2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-14vs Fall Winners/Vineyards -Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Jhanji / Carolyn Matje vs Laura Jolly / Dana Wagoner3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hansen / Tonja Brewer vs Nicki Sebold / Dayna Webre5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMira Rochford / Tracy Maurer vs Gina Adiutori / Diana Wong1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Lynn Johns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Nada Pivcevic
published
4.19
Jane Jhanji
published
4.16
Sara Wachs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Tracy Maurer
published
4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
4.00
Karen Defiore
published
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.99
Jennifer Hansen
published
3.96
Carolyn Matje
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Tonja Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Macey Tyll
published
3.87
Cheryl Cohen
published 4.5
3.78
Mira Rochford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Michelle Kraft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wachs + Lynn Johns19956% games−2.9% vs expected
MacKenzie Kraft + Michelle Kraft81151% gamesnot enough data
Sara Wachs + Carolyn Matje3246% gamesnot enough data
MacKenzie Kraft + Mira Rochford134 matchesnot enough data
Mira Rochford + Carolyn Matje044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Cheryl Cohen134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Tracy Maurer134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Jhanji + Carolyn Matje314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Nada Pivcevic
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Jane Jhanji
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Sara Wachs
147W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Tracy Maurer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Stephanie Foley
39W–27L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Karen Defiore
16W–32L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
MacKenzie Kraft
26W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
4.00
Jennifer Hansen
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Carolyn Matje
59W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Macey Tyll
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Cheryl Cohen
82W–56L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.87
Mira Rochford
48W–78L career · 6 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.78
Michelle Kraft
50W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.