Teams

SGV Flint Foxpack-Ortiz-Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU12

2024 Mixed Doubles - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 8.0 Mixed Division

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - 8.0 Mixed Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Irina Abadzheva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
TJ St Marie
published
3.85
Dave Sparks
published 4
3.81
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.80
Rebecca Escandon
published 4
3.79
Yukishi Yamamoto
published
3.78
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.77
Penapa Frick
published
3.70
Lorna Kim
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Cindi Carter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Vladimir Abadzhev
published
3.49
Kristin McQueen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.22
Carla Denker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin McQueen + Dave Sparks1841% games+0.7% vs expected
Irina Abadzheva + Vladimir Abadzhev4845% games−5.0% vs expected
Amy Hasquet + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes2442% gamesnot enough data
Lorna Kim + Richard Ortiz-Reyes404 matchesnot enough data
Lorna Kim + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Hasquet + Dave Sparks044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Hasquet + TJ St Marie044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irina Abadzheva
234W–146L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
TJ St Marie
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Dave Sparks
26W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Rebecca Escandon
158W–86L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.80
Yukishi Yamamoto
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
Penapa Frick
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Lorna Kim
210W–162L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cindi Carter
150W–114L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Vladimir Abadzhev
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Kristin McQueen
208W–189L career · 2 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Carla Denker
158W–132L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.