Teams

WTC: 3.0 Kiss My Ace

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-02vs SLI: Randall's TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesPuja Chandiramani / Mary Bianchi vs Megan .del Valle / Jessica Kayll6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHallie Nazar de Jaucourt / Eleanor DeLeo vs Jaime Fliman / Jessica Berens6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJaclyn Aronson / Diane Martin vs Alicia Ulin / Jessica Tamberlane3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKristin Martinez / Meghan Rossi vs Kari Bilik / Elana Minkove6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPuja Chandiramani / Mary Bianchi vs Lisa Ferree / Fran Smith6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Luiza Comparini vs Kerrie Braff / Stephanie Knispel6-4, 6-0
2025-10-29vs Sportime HIWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuiza Comparini / Paisley Fenyes vs Elizabeth Bernstein / Jill Stafford6-0, 7-5
W#1 DoublesMeghan Rossi / Jaclyn Aronson vs Susan Barnes-Girling / Una Dean7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaisley Fenyes / Puja Chandiramani vs Johanna Snyder / Wendy Sayles6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan McFarland / Jenny Marinak vs Jennifer Taubenfeld / Stephanie Secchia6-4, 6-4
2025-10-08vs Scarsdale Golf Club: Rally QueensWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Aronson / Meghan Rossi vs Melissa Eisenberg / DIVYA KAISHAP6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJenny Marinak / Luiza Comparini vs Staci Greene / Ran Phelps6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Tormey / Nicole Paxton vs Michelle Ko / Kristin Mastoras6-2, 6-3
2025-09-29vs Sportime Lake IsleWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Kristin Martinez vs Laurie Medvinsky / Sharon Higgins6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHallie Nazar de Jaucourt / Puja Chandiramani vs Edie Owen / Julie Rosenblatt6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLuiza Comparini / Eleanor DeLeo vs Frances Magrino / Elizabeth Hoexter6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Luiza Comparini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Kristin Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Lea Loveland
published
2.99
Danielle Tormey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Mary Bianchi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Jaclyn Aronson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Puja Chandiramani
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Paisley Fenyes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Eleanor DeLeo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Jenny Marinak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Georgia Dyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Meghan Rossi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Megan McFarland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Emily Tisdale
published
2.67
Nicole Paxton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Shrujal Baxi
published
Jamie Leahy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgia Dyer + Kristin Martinez5167% games+12.6% vs expected
Jaclyn Aronson + Meghan Rossi9357% games+9.1% vs expected
Jaclyn Aronson + Georgia Dyer5158% games+8.9% vs expected
Jaclyn Aronson + Kristin Martinez6159% games+2.5% vs expected
Georgia Dyer + Meghan Rossi4550% games+0.5% vs expected
Paisley Fenyes + Mary Bianchi4155% gamesnot enough data
Puja Chandiramani + Mary Bianchi5066% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Tormey + Eleanor DeLeo4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luiza Comparini
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Kristin Martinez
28W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Lea Loveland
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Danielle Tormey
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mary Bianchi
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jaclyn Aronson
52W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Puja Chandiramani
59W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Paisley Fenyes
125W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Eleanor DeLeo
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jenny Marinak
27W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt
31W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Georgia Dyer
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Meghan Rossi
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Megan McFarland
33W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Emily Tisdale
37W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Nicole Paxton
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Shrujal Baxi
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jamie Leahy
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.