Teams

Sportime HI: Hits & Giggles/Ferree

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-25vs Sportime HI: ArmadaWon 21
W#1 DoublesKari Bilik / Elana Minkove vs Jennifer Barney / Erica MacGregor6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Ferree / Dana Post vs Kate Hofmann / Finola Hurley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNataliya Gambino / Susan Nask vs Maureen Winner / Sarah Ryan6-3, 6-2
2025-11-19vs WTC: 3.0 Kiss My AceLost 12
W#1 DoublesKari Bilik / Elana Minkove vs Kristin Martinez / Meghan Rossi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Ferree / Fran Smith vs Puja Chandiramani / Mary Bianchi2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKerrie Braff / Stephanie Knispel vs Georgia Dyer / Luiza Comparini4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLisa Ferree / Kari Bilik vs Ulrike Heregger / Jeanne Grzywacz2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElana Minkove / Alynn Perl vs Joanna Liebman / Una Dean6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Knispel / Jessy Choi vs Sarah Dunn / Jennifer Taubenfeld7-5, 6-1
2025-10-23vs Scarsdale Golf Club: Rally QueensWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Ferree / Kari Bilik vs Rebekah Hunker / Melissa Eisenberg7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElana Minkove / Alynn Perl vs Mego Gojka / Staci Greene2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Knispel / Nataliya Gambino vs Yookyung Chung / Michelle Ko6-3, 6-1
2025-10-14vs Sportime Lake IsleWon 30
W#1 DoublesFran Smith / Nataliya Gambino vs Linda Fang / Edie Owen7-5, 5-3
W#2 DoublesAlynn Perl / Susan Nask vs Gwynn Hurshman / Frances Magrino6-3, 4-1
W#3 DoublesDana Post / Kerrie Braff vs Angela Eaves / Julie Rosenblatt6-2, 7-5
2025-09-26vs Sportime HIWon 21
W#1 DoublesKari Bilik / Elana Minkove vs Elizabeth Bernstein / Deborah Bharucha6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNataliya Gambino / Jessy Choi vs Carol Holtby / Audrey Broome6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Knispel / Kerrie Braff vs Ragne Ross / Casey Levin1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-16vs SLI: Randall's TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesFran Smith / Elana Minkove vs Alicia Ulin / Jaime Fliman7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Ferree / Dana Post vs Megan .del Valle / Sandra Wang6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKerrie Braff / Jessy Choi vs Carolina Endara-collado / Una Chae6-1, 6-2
2025-09-10vs NRRC: Full Metal RacketsWon 21
W#1 DoublesFran Smith / Lisa Ferree vs Molly DeCresce / Amanda Heller6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNataliya Gambino / Alynn Perl vs MICHELLE CHIU / Megan Watkins6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Regan / Stephanie Knispel vs Katie Ciravolo / Kathy Palermo2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Kari Bilik
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Ferree
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen Regan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Dana Post
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Nataliya Gambino
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Susan Nask
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Elana Minkove
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Jessy Choi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Alynn Perl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Fran Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.72
Kerrie Braff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Stephanie Knispel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Stern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Post + Kari Bilik8270% games+12.1% vs expected
Nataliya Gambino + Alynn Perl12360% games+6.4% vs expected
Fran Smith + Kari Bilik11459% games+2.7% vs expected
Lisa Ferree + Rebecca Stern12655% games+1.4% vs expected
Elana Minkove + Kari Bilik22958% games+1.4% vs expected
Elana Minkove + Fran Smith16855% games+0.7% vs expected
Fran Smith + Lisa Ferree2647% games−9.2% vs expected
Kerrie Braff + Stephanie Knispel5346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kari Bilik
132W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Lisa Ferree
89W–62L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Karen Regan
82W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Dana Post
67W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Nataliya Gambino
40W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Elana Minkove
100W–81L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Jessy Choi
35W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Alynn Perl
35W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Fran Smith
64W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Kerrie Braff
39W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Stephanie Knispel
51W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Rebecca Stern
26W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.