Teams

SLI: Randall's Team

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-02vs WTC: 3.0 Kiss My AceSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJaime Fliman / Jessica Berens vs Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt / Eleanor DeLeo2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Jessica Tamberlane vs Jaclyn Aronson / Diane Martin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-18vs Sportime Lake IsleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJaime Fliman / Margie Tan vs Laurie Medvinsky / Amy Nadasdi1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Jessica Tamberlane vs Frances Magrino / Edie Owen6-3, 6-4
2025-10-28vs Sportime HI: ArmadaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Jessica Kayll vs Kate Hofmann / Jennifer Barney1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan West / Megan .del Valle vs Colleen van Valen / Maureen Winner1-6, 2-6
2025-10-24vs Sportime HILost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan West / Theresa Burton Sprague vs Jill Stafford / Emily Cappo4-6, 3-6
2025-10-16vs Scarsdale Golf Club: Rally QueensSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJessica Kayll / Haynee Johnson vs Ran Phelps / Staci Greene1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMegan .del Valle / Susan West vs Yookyung Chung / Alison Milam6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan West / Una Chae vs Sarah Dunn / Johanna Snyder7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-16vs Sportime HI: Hits & Giggles/FerreeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Jaime Fliman vs Fran Smith / Elana Minkove6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan .del Valle / Sandra Wang vs Lisa Ferree / Dana Post1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Susan West
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Alicia Ulin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.69
Jaime Fliman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Haynee Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Sandra Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jenni Bounds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Ulin + Jaime Fliman3257% games+11.0% vs expected
Haynee Johnson + Susan West2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan West
8W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3.5
Alicia Ulin
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
Jaime Fliman
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Haynee Johnson
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Sandra Wang
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jenni Bounds
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.