Teams

NRRC: Full Metal Rackets

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

14 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-19vs Scarsdale Golf Club: Rally QueensLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Bencosme / Katie Ciravolo vs Ran Phelps / Melissa Eisenberg3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMolly DeCresce / Amanda Heller vs Mego Gojka / Staci Greene0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ross / Aubriana Lopez vs Emera Lasalle / Michelle Ko6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-05vs SLI: Randall's TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Schwarcz / Kathy Palermo vs Jessica Kayll / Jessica Tamberlane6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Shipley / Megan Watkins vs Megan .del Valle / Jessica Berens6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMICHELLE CHIU / Molly DeCresce vs jill friedson / Theresa Burton Sprague6-2, 6-1
2025-10-24vs Sportime HI: ArmadaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Shipley / Kathy Palermo vs Kate Hofmann / Erica MacGregor4-6, 0-6
2025-10-08vs Sportime HIWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Shipley / Kathy Palermo vs Audrey Broome / Karen Hall6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Palermo / MICHELLE CHIU vs Una Dean / Wendy Sayles2-6, 2-6
2025-09-10vs Sportime HI: Hits & Giggles/FerreeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly DeCresce / Amanda Heller vs Fran Smith / Lisa Ferree1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMICHELLE CHIU / Megan Watkins vs Nataliya Gambino / Alynn Perl2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Ciravolo / Kathy Palermo vs Karen Regan / Stephanie Knispel6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Megan Jeffry
published
2.83
Dana Schwarcz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Katie Ciravolo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Kathy Palermo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Amanda Heller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Ana Bencosme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Susan Shipley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Molly DeCresce
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
MICHELLE CHIU
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Stephanie Leone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Megan Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Anita Balaji
published 3
2.31
Aubriana Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.26
Melissa Klosk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Palermo + Katie Ciravolo5261% games+10.2% vs expected
Dana Schwarcz + Kathy Palermo14457% games+9.0% vs expected
Molly DeCresce + Amanda Heller9257% games+7.0% vs expected
Susan Shipley + Megan Watkins4448% games+5.9% vs expected
MICHELLE CHIU + Kathy Palermo3446% games+5.8% vs expected
MICHELLE CHIU + Ana Bencosme7555% games+5.7% vs expected
Amanda Heller + Susan Shipley6553% games+3.9% vs expected
Molly DeCresce + Susan Shipley2740% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Jeffry
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Dana Schwarcz
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Katie Ciravolo
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Kathy Palermo
47W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Amanda Heller
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ana Bencosme
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Susan Shipley
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Molly DeCresce
25W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
MICHELLE CHIU
19W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
Stephanie Leone
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
Megan Watkins
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
3
Anita Balaji
12W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.33
2.5
Aubriana Lopez
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Melissa Klosk
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.