Teams

STIRLING CLUB

2021 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 2.5 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-01vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGuadalupe Sherman / Lubi Georgieva vs Valerie Witherspoon / Cindy Pierce2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTharika Irvin vs Valentina Herzog6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCerisse Ward / Debra Kelleher vs Blythe Mancini / Karen Asquith6-7, 2-6
2021-11-17vs CLUB RIDGESLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Debra Kelleher vs Nyree Hartman Saad / Renee Yackira3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTharika Irvin vs Nattaly Aleman6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLori Smith / Stephanie Stephen vs Jamie Sabet / Maryam Kaveh3-6, 1-6
2021-11-10vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGuadalupe Sherman / Tharika Irvin vs Yuanhong Du / Chelsea Nguyen2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Vivian McCarthy6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Cerisse Ward vs Jessica Stuart / Karla Bee0-6, 0-6
2021-11-03vs CANYON GATE #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Guadalupe Sherman vs Anjanette Bixel / Rachel Milford6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTharika Irvin vs Angela Renteria6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCerisse Ward / Lubi Georgieva vs Lesley Igou / Lisa Schnitz4-6, 4-6
2021-10-27vs SPANISH TRAILLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Guadalupe Sherman vs Alexandria Chang / Elizabeth Templeton0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTharika Irvin vs Jenny Mulopulos6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Lori Smith vs Catherine Fadrowsky / Hollie Millican4-6, 3-6
2021-10-20vs DTC #4Won 21
W#1 DoublesTharika Irvin / Karen Veazey vs Supriya Prasad / Amy Bernstein6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGuadalupe Sherman vs Geraldine Davis6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCerisse Ward / Lori Smith vs Joan Chinn / Lisa Dickstein4-6, 5-7
2021-10-13vs CLUB RIDGESLost 12
L#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Guadalupe Sherman vs Courtney Long / Jamie Sabet4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTharika Irvin vs Vinne Chen7-5, 1-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Veazey / Stephanie Stephen vs Golssa Moridi / Maryam Kaveh3-6, 3-6
2021-10-06vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Tharika Irvin vs Karen Asquith / Teri Kerr6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLubi Georgieva vs Blythe Mancini4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Lindsey / Debra Kelleher vs Jennifer Sanderson / Irina Tikhonova6-0, 6-1
2021-09-29vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Lindsey / Tharika Irvin vs Jessica Baran / Daniella Toms6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Cindi Song4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Cerisse Ward vs Kimberly Penny / Sandra Walford1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-22vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Guadalupe Sherman vs Yuanhong Du / Chelsea Nguyen4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTharika Irvin vs Jessica Stuart6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Lori Smith vs Beth Spreitzer / Karla Bee2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Tharika Irvin
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Emily Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Karen Veazey
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.35
Debra Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cerisse Ward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Guadalupe Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 2.5
Lubi Georgieva
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
1.76
1.63
Stephanie Stephen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Stephen + Debra Kelleher1539% games+4.3% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Debra Kelleher71445% games+2.1% vs expected
Guadalupe Sherman + Debra Kelleher4742% games−1.4% vs expected
Guadalupe Sherman + Stephanie Stephen1536% games−3.2% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Lubi Georgieva61342% games−3.9% vs expected
Lubi Georgieva + Debra Kelleher11632% games−4.5% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Guadalupe Sherman3746% games−5.8% vs expected
Cerisse Ward + Debra Kelleher2538% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tharika Irvin
162W–49L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3
Emily Lindsey
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Karen Veazey
111W–148L career · 8 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Debra Kelleher
87W–146L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Cerisse Ward
6W–52L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Guadalupe Sherman
51W–78L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Lubi Georgieva
37W–92L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Arlene Joyner-Tucker
19W–76L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.76
2.5
Stephanie Stephen
15W–91L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.