Teams

Naistat

2025 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 7.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-06vs Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEdward Richardson / Mike Ericson vs Robert Lang / John Genz7-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Carlson / Peter Krause vs John Goulett / Thanh Pham5-7
2025-06-29vs Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Ericson / Edward Richardson vs Mark Alschlager / John Genz1-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Krause / Richard Naistat vs Thanh Pham / Bill McCann6-7
W#3 DoublesVan Dickerson / Leigh Carlson vs Ken McAdam / Timothy Orgeman6-3
2025-06-15vs Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Krause / Richard Naistat vs Mike Hicks / Rick Hancks3-6
L#2 DoublesMike Ericson / Edward Richardson vs Ken McAdam / Thomas Petersen2-6
2025-06-01vs Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Carlson / Edward Richardson vs Thomas Petersen / Randall Paulson6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Naistat / Van Dickerson vs Eric Narvaez / Patrick Ledray6-1
L#3 DoublesMike Ericson / Peter Krause vs Ken McAdam / Bill McCann3-6
2025-05-25vs Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesVan Dickerson / Richard Naistat vs Rick Hancks / Tu Van4-6
L#2 DoublesMike Ericson / Edward Richardson vs Charles Bobertz / Richard Iverson2-6
2025-05-18vs Northern/Narvaez/65&Over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesVan Dickerson / Richard Naistat vs John Goulett / Mark Alschlager3-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Carlson / Mike Ericson vs Michael Trangle / Gaylon Rust3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Edward Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Leigh Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mike Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Krause
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Naistat
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Van Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Richardson + Mike Ericson2439% gamesnot enough data
Richard Naistat + Van Dickerson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Edward Richardson
6W–7L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Leigh Carlson
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Ericson
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Krause
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Naistat
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Van Dickerson
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.