Teams

Billings/Wilson 3.5W 55s Wed PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-17vs Chance 3.5W 55s Wed PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Karen Olson vs Missy Chance / Darci Gold6-1, 6-1
2024-04-10vs Kirby 3.5W 55s Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Britt Flanagan vs Mary Dean / Sheri Cram2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-07vs Michaels 3.5W 55s Wed PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesAprille Black / Emily Wilson vs Sharon Braxton / Sherri Frazier6-3, 6-3
2024-04-03vs Michaels 3.5W 55s Wed PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Karen Olson vs Terrie Brown / Gayle Taylordean6-2, 6-2
2024-03-20vs Redding/White 3.5W 55s Wed PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauran Epstein / Emily Wilson vs Gwen Highsmith-Quick / Betty Haggard6-1, 6-4
2024-03-11vs Kirby 3.5W 55s Wed PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Mary Winstead vs Robyn Manning / Margaret Joseph1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Laura Hertweck
published
3.34
Lauran Epstein
published
3.30
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.10
Janice Gilman
published
3.07
Sheila Schmedes
published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Mary Winstead
published
2.99
Elia Mavronikolas
published
2.87
Samantha Stichter
published
2.77
Laura Ambler
published
2.71
Linda Widman
published
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aprille Black + Janice Gilman213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Winstead + Lauran Epstein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Hertweck
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Lauran Epstein
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Janice Gilman
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
Sheila Schmedes
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 6 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
Elia Mavronikolas
27W–40L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Samantha Stichter
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Laura Ambler
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Linda Widman
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Melinda Billings
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.