Teams

NC:Aces Up: Doughney/Visokey

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs OGT:OGTAgonals:WreschnerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesClaire Traugott / Erica Visokey vs Bonnie Wreschner / Lauren Mattson3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNina Doughney vs Tammy Tavdy6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIvy Lin / Antje Hilarius vs Julie Christie / Eloina Cortes6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMeghan Miller / Caroline Smit vs Lauren Longest / Lauren Lufkin2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesErica Visokey / Jessica Kooris vs Deena Ebright / Kimberly Steinberg7-6, 4-5
W#1 SinglesNina Doughney vs Rory VanGelder6-4, 4-4
W#2 DoublesHolly Brittain / Claire Traugott vs Sophie Blomberg / Regan Gilbride6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIvy Lin / Leah Kittredge vs Stacey Warshaw / Jill Blomberg6-2, 6-2
2026-07-01vs OGT: Synergy:du ToitSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMeagan Brody / Emi Mills vs Katerina Donovan / Ana Kostovic3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaire Traugott vs Francine Fang1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessenea Chen / Leah Kittredge vs Stephanie Secchia / Wendy Sayles4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLibby Mattson / Anna Satzinger vs Kimberly Gould / Shrujal Baxi7-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesEmi Mills / Claire Traugott vs Lindsay Rosen / Deena Ebright6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErica Visokey vs Rory VanGelder6-7, 2-5
W#2 DoublesMelanie Chen / KATHERINE KELLEHER vs Kimberly Steinberg / Regan Gilbride6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeah Kittredge / Libby Mattson vs Jill Blomberg / Ellen Naidorf6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesErica Visokey / Holly Brittain vs Christina Passaretti / Tracy Marra6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmi Mills vs Jessica Morin7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessenea Chen / Melanie Chen vs Serina Dansker / Naina McKinley2-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnna Satzinger / Libby Mattson vs Renee Bea / Jessica Levey6-4, 6-3
2026-06-02vs OGT:OGTAgonals:WreschnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesErica Visokey / Jessica Kooris vs Jennifer Garnett / Lindsay Tulchin7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNina Doughney vs Cynthia Goodstein6-4, 5-5
L#2 DoublesMeredith Jansen / Leah Kittredge vs Anastasia Fetisov / Julie Christie1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Decker / Caroline Smit vs Melina Hamza-Smith / Marisa Geddo2-6, 1-6
2026-05-26vs CP:Serves You Right: Mostofi/MarraLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmi Mills / Claire Traugott vs Karol Matkins / Lisa Chu7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNina Doughney vs Jessica Morin6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKATHERINE KELLEHER / Jessenea Chen vs Barbara Yallop / Lori Malerba0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Decker / Meghan Miller vs Serina Dansker / Naina McKinley0-6, 0-6
2026-05-19vs OGT: Synergy:du ToitWon 31
L#1 DoublesEmi Mills / Claire Traugott vs Jenny Marinak / Megan McFarland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAntje Hilarius vs Ana Kostovic7-6, 5-3
W#2 DoublesNina Doughney / Erica Visokey vs Shrujal Baxi / Nicole Paxton6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeah Kittredge / KATHERINE KELLEHER vs Janet Kitty Cadsawan / Joanna Liebman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Holly Brittain
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.92
Emi Mills
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.90
Nina Doughney
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.82
Libby Mattson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Ivy Lin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Claire Traugott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Anna Satzinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Antje Hilarius
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
KATHERINE KELLEHER
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Amy Hollander
published 3
2.68
Jessica Kooris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Leah Kittredge
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Megan Decker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Erica Visokey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.39
Jane Crawford
published
2.31
Jessenea Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Caroline Smit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Meagan Brody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Chen
published
Meredith Jansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emi Mills + Meagan Brody7080% games+19.1% vs expected
Nina Doughney + Erica Visokey7554% games+3.9% vs expected
Ivy Lin + Erica Visokey2345% games+2.0% vs expected
Meredith Jansen + Nina Doughney134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Brittain + Claire Traugott314 matchesnot enough data
Jessenea Chen + Erica Visokey123 matchesnot enough data
Emi Mills + Claire Traugott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Brittain
21W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Emi Mills
30W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
Nina Doughney
36W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Libby Mattson
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Ivy Lin
39W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Claire Traugott
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Anna Satzinger
3W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Antje Hilarius
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
KATHERINE KELLEHER
25W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Amy Hollander
23W–36L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jessica Kooris
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Leah Kittredge
23W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Megan Decker
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Erica Visokey
22W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jane Crawford
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Jessenea Chen
13W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
2.5
Caroline Smit
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Meagan Brody
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Chen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Jansen
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.