Teams

TRC:Smash Charmers: Chen

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesTami Siriwardene / Nancy Day vs Lancia Blatchley / Gina Watts0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarina Leggio vs Heather Bradley6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPaige Couture / Lindsey Bloomenthal vs Joanne Dragunoff / Karen Grosjean6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Chen / Lauren Shugrue vs Laura Freebairn-Smith / Sabrina Fried7-6, 2-4
2026-07-11vs TCT:3.0 Racquette:BuschauerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRen Beckford / Paige Couture vs Stacy Byron / Amy Carniol5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Day / Laura Hotchkiss vs Deirdre Chrostowski / Natalie Czaplinski1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnnmarie Maguire / Lauren Shugrue vs Melissa Langhan / Ellen McCabe1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-14vs GF:Causing a Racquet:McEwenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarina Leggio / Cindy Chen vs Mallory Botta / Suzanne Black6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMakiko Coakley vs Molly Franke6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCliona Becker / Christina Spizzirri vs Kaitlin Mcdermott / Erica Millard5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRen Beckford / Nancy Day vs Jamie Rubin / Kathy McEwen3-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs GF:Causing a Racquet:McEwenLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Maguire / Nancy Day vs Lynette Roth / Mallory Botta4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCarina Leggio vs Molly Franke6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Spizzirri / Ren Beckford vs Stacey Smith / Kaitlin Mcdermott1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCliona Becker / Melissa Paul vs Donna Philbin / Suzanne Black1-6, 4-6
2026-05-15vs TCT:3.0 Racquette:BuschauerLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelissa Paul / Laura Hotchkiss vs Emily DeGrand / Kristen Scully0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMakiko Coakley vs Caroline Fisher6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLauren Shugrue / Cindy Chen vs Deirdre Chrostowski / Natalie Czaplinski1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnnmarie Maguire / Lindsey Bloomenthal vs Ellen McCabe / Sheri Pillo4-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs 4S:Kicking Aces:Tuohy/DurdenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCliona Becker / Cindy Chen vs Monica Black / Joanna Lepore1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarina Leggio vs Laura Denis6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMakiko Coakley / Paige Couture vs Haiku Durden / Bebe McCarthy0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Day / Tami Siriwardene vs Kleo Girandola / Sheila Levine6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesCindy Chen / Annmarie Maguire vs Lancia Blatchley / Yvonne Galli6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMakiko Coakley vs Heather Bradley6-7, 3-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Couture / Lauren Shugrue vs Karen Grosjean / Katie Shaw6-7, 4-5
2026-04-26vs 4S:Kicking Aces:Tuohy/DurdenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNancy Day / Tami Siriwardene vs Toni Tuohy / Anne Marcus7-6, 5-4
W#1 SinglesCarina Leggio vs amanda kaslowitz6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Hotchkiss / Ren Beckford vs Mandi Schmauch / Joanna Lepore3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Shugrue / Cliona Becker vs Sara Ezrin / Hillary Mcgrail0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Carina Leggio
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.83
Makiko Coakley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Annmarie Maguire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Paige Couture
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Lindsey Bloomenthal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Christina Spizzirri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Ren Beckford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Lauren Shugrue
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Cliona Becker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Tami Siriwardene
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Laura Hotchkiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Melissa Paul
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hotchkiss + Christina Spizzirri1548% games−1.0% vs expected
Laura Hotchkiss + Annmarie Maguire044 matchesnot enough data
Tami Siriwardene + Annmarie Maguire213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carina Leggio
5W–0L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Makiko Coakley
31W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Annmarie Maguire
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Paige Couture
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Lindsey Bloomenthal
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Christina Spizzirri
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Ren Beckford
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Lauren Shugrue
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
Cliona Becker
7W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Tami Siriwardene
51W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Laura Hotchkiss
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Melissa Paul
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Nancy Day
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.