Teams

WRC:Volley Girls:Woolverton

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-18vs WST: Drop Shots: Rosoff/WylieWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Bento / Lauren Zirn vs Lisa Sandhaus / Shannon Wten6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanet Crystal / April Lebowitz vs Erica Winkler / Molly Butler4-6, 6-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Kutnick / Lena Starovoitov vs Jessie Knopp / Debra Miller7-6, 5-5
2026-07-12vs NEW: You Got Served: KaplanLost 04
L#1 DoublesEliza Doolittle / Mariette Solleveld vs Kaitlin Ervin / Amanda Warren4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Fagan vs Patricia Molinero4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Woolverton / Janet Aitoro vs Lindsay Gruhl / Emily Guttman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Beecher / Lisa Cicale Moskal vs Jill Marousek / Asha Shah2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesHiam Asmar / Margaret Woolverton vs Karen Connors / Michelle Woodward6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Cicale Moskal vs Tao Yang1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGloria Bruck / Nancy Bento vs Jaime Booth / Amy Lang7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Kutnick / Janet Aitoro vs Kathy Knapp / Lori Barshop6-1, 6-4
2026-06-20vs 4S:Tempest:O'Brien/ CorriganWon 21
L#1 DoublesHiam Asmar / Mariette Solleveld vs Sabrina Seidman / Karen Stutman4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Beecher / Eliza Doolittle vs Christine Corrigan / Monica O'Brien6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Cicale Moskal / Deniz Dalay vs Sung Kim / Leanne Bradley6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAnna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan vs Amy Lang / Kathleen Nicholson7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMariette Solleveld vs Nancy Murphy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEliza Doolittle / Janet Crystal vs Lisa Dalinka / Katie Ferguson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSharon Beecher / Marie Louise Smith vs Donna Sargeantson / Alisa Dror6-4, 4-4
2026-06-04vs NEW: You Got Served: KaplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan vs Michelle Fine / Lee Ann Heller6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMargaret Woolverton / Lauren Zirn vs Kelly Miller / Patricia Molinero6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Cicale Moskal / Laura Kutnick vs Dawn Kornstein / Kristen Otis0-6, 4-6
2026-05-28vs 4S:Tempest:O'Brien/ CorriganSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEliza Doolittle / Nancy Bento vs Melanie Redl / Carolynn Frankel6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLena Starovoitov vs Jennifer McKee5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Woolverton / Jacqueline Passios vs Kelly Maloney / Monica O'Brien6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGloria Bruck / Deniz Dalay vs Leanne Bradley / Amy Kelley7-5, 6-4
2026-05-21vs WST: Drop Shots: Rosoff/WylieWon 40
W#1 DoublesLauren Zirn / Hiam Asmar vs Erica Winkler / Lisa Sandhaus6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMariette Solleveld vs Jessica Krupa7-5, 3-5
W#2 DoublesMyra Goldberg / April Lebowitz vs Loreen Beaudry / Ellie Spangler6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGloria Bruck / Janet Aitoro vs Liza Wylie / Dale Yvette Davis7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Kelly Fagan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Lauren Zirn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Anna Eliseenkova
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Margaret Woolverton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Myra Goldberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Hiam Asmar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Eliza Doolittle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Jacqueline Passios
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Mariette Solleveld
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.75
Janet Crystal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Nancy Bento
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Sharon Beecher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
April Lebowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Deniz Dalay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Janet Aitoro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Gloria Bruck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Lisa Cicale Moskal
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.49
Marie Louise Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Laura Kutnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lena Starovoitov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Eliseenkova + Nancy Bento4356% games+6.2% vs expected
Margaret Woolverton + Hiam Asmar3549% games+6.1% vs expected
Myra Goldberg + Kelly Fagan4262% games+5.9% vs expected
Myra Goldberg + Margaret Woolverton5257% games+5.1% vs expected
Margaret Woolverton + Sharon Beecher6451% games+3.0% vs expected
Margaret Woolverton + Lauren Zirn5258% games+2.5% vs expected
Anna Eliseenkova + Margaret Woolverton5454% games+2.2% vs expected
Myra Goldberg + Lauren Zirn6255% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Fagan
52W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Lauren Zirn
48W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Anna Eliseenkova
110W–127L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Margaret Woolverton
76W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Myra Goldberg
75W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Hiam Asmar
88W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Eliza Doolittle
41W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jacqueline Passios
39W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Mariette Solleveld
58W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Janet Crystal
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Nancy Bento
49W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Sharon Beecher
35W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
April Lebowitz
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Deniz Dalay
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Janet Aitoro
29W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Gloria Bruck
39W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Lisa Cicale Moskal
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Marie Louise Smith
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Laura Kutnick
27W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Lena Starovoitov
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.