Teams

Canyon Creek/Whitaker W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-19vs Royal Oaks/Copley W.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShelley Hicks / Colleen Petersen vs Mandy Evans / Rachel Cutshaw0-6, 2-6
2025-05-22vs McKinney/Pike-Garza W3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShelley Hicks / Colleen Petersen vs Margaret Bronsweig / Renee Simpson3-6, 2-6
2025-05-15vs DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesColleen Petersen / Melanie Powell vs Tracey Berta / Sheila Conner5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShelley Hicks vs Katie Pearson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Chrissy Stansell
usually #1 Doubles 22%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.59
Jacqueline Carson
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.58
Sarah Snitker
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.40
Camille Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.40
Jenifer Mathews
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Brianna Fluellen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
ROSEMARY BATES
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.27
Katharine Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.25
Jennifer Whitaker
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.22
Hazel Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.15
Jean Sills
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Colleen Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Shelley Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Kristen Economaki
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Tarryn Uran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Davenport + Jacqueline Carson13068% games+14.1% vs expected
Jennifer Whitaker + Sarah Snitker3262% games+7.7% vs expected
Sarah Snitker + Jacqueline Carson7263% games+2.1% vs expected
Hazel Robbins + Tarryn Uran6260% gamesnot enough data
ROSEMARY BATES + Jacqueline Carson224 matchesnot enough data
Jenifer Mathews + Sarah Snitker404 matchesnot enough data
Brianna Fluellen + Jenifer Mathews303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Whitaker + Jacqueline Carson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chrissy Stansell
32W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Jacqueline Carson
44W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sarah Snitker
44W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Camille Davenport
22W–1L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jenifer Mathews
20W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Brianna Fluellen
20W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
ROSEMARY BATES
25W–35L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Katharine Saunders
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Whitaker
17W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Hazel Robbins
18W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Jean Sills
12W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Colleen Petersen
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Shelley Hicks
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Kristen Economaki
10W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tarryn Uran
25W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.