Teams

Royal Oaks/Copley W.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-26vs Bent Tree/Sarché-Wilder W3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesKelley Green / Fran Matise vs Rhonda Smith / Stacey Iorio5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Benson / Mary Yang vs Nicole Russell / Emily Sarche6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Cox vs Cynthia Wilder5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Duffy / Pressley Peters vs Leslie Morris / Abigail Rogers4-6, 4-6
2025-06-20vs The Nelson/Stoll-Wood W3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesFran Matise / Janice van Arsdale vs August Wood / Aimee Rodriguez6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmber Carter / Pressley Peters vs Colleen Christl / Astyn Davis1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKelley Green vs Heather Perkins6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Duffy / Lindsay Mayer vs Anne Givens / Bonnie Black4-6, 2-6
2025-06-05vs Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesCourtney Gilbert / Denise Marshall vs Asheley Wagnon / Jessica Kirwan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelley Green / Amy Benson vs London Henderson / Johanna Anderson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Duffy / Mandy Evans vs Courtney Younts / Sheri Stinson6-3, 6-1
2025-05-29vs Lakes/Leeper-Bingham W3.5Lost 23
L#1 DoublesJanice van Arsdale / Courtney Gilbert vs Ryane Criswell / Julie Hoang3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKelley Green vs Allison Leeper6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Wallace / Pressley Peters vs Erika Meade / Tonya Keith6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesEmily Cox vs Jill Fain5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMandy Evans / Mary Beth Duffy vs Carlin Mihm / Nicole McAfee1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKelly Turco / Denise Marshall vs Amanda Robertson / Jennifer Evans6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice van Arsdale / Lindsay Mayer vs Taylor Nicholson / Constance Cherones3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKerri Scott vs Katie Pearson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPressley Peters / Amber Carter vs Chelsea Bailey / Shelby Dolson7-5, 7-6
2025-05-12vs DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Benson / Courtney Gilbert vs Amy Moore / Holly Myers6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Gasch / Kelley Green vs Tracey Berta / Jenny Littlefield6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Cox vs Catherine Moss7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmber Carter / Pressley Peters vs Amy Timmerman / Mary Sisk6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kelley Green
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.49
Kelly Turco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Fran Matise
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.44
Janice van Arsdale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Andrea Bradford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Kerri Scott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Julie Gasch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Rachel Cutshaw
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.31
Courtney Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Copley
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.21
Mary Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Mary Beth Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lindsay Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Pressley Peters
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Emily Cox
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Emily Seifert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Wallace
published
Mandy Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Matise + Janice van Arsdale404 matchesnot enough data
Kerri Scott + Kelley Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Green
20W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Kelly Turco
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Fran Matise
15W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Janice van Arsdale
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Andrea Bradford
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kerri Scott
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Julie Gasch
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Rachel Cutshaw
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Courtney Gilbert
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Erin Copley
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Mary Yang
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Mary Beth Duffy
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Lindsay Mayer
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Pressley Peters
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Emily Cox
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Emily Seifert
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Wallace
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mandy Evans
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.