Teams

The Nelson/Stoll-Wood W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

26 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-20vs Royal Oaks/Copley W.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesAugust Wood / Aimee Rodriguez vs Fran Matise / Janice van Arsdale4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesColleen Christl / Astyn Davis vs Amber Carter / Pressley Peters6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesColleen Christl / Aimee Rodriguez vs Corinne Carpenter / Kristen Merrill6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChasti Gest / Aimee Rodriguez vs Sunny Hwang / Erika Meade6-7, 3-6
2025-05-08vs DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJacie Vittitow / Aimee Rodriguez vs Carol Barrows / Molly Holley6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Samantha Wicker
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.71
Heidi Moore
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.64
August Wood
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.48
Heather Perkins
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.47
Chasti Gest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Erin Storey
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.40
Carrie Neale
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Clare Holbrook
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Anne Givens
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Aimee Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Rachel Stoll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Stephanie Barna
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.37
Kelly Penny
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Astyn Davis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jacie Vittitow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.29
Bonnie Black
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Marci Barke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
JoAnn Morley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ainsley Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Colleen Christl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Beckey Fuller
published 3.5
3.18
Carolyn Strickfaden
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Mandi Schmitz
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Amber James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Julie Harner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kaitlyn Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

August Wood + Chasti Gest15363% games+6.9% vs expected
Chasti Gest + Anne Givens9359% games−0.0% vs expected
Anne Givens + Stephanie Barna6064% gamesnot enough data
Astyn Davis + Rachel Stoll4161% gamesnot enough data
Anne Givens + Bonnie Black1441% gamesnot enough data
Amber James + Erin Storey404 matchesnot enough data
Beckey Fuller + Aimee Rodriguez123 matchesnot enough data
Beckey Fuller + Rachel Stoll213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Wicker
19W–2L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Heidi Moore
31W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
August Wood
39W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Heather Perkins
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Chasti Gest
37W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Erin Storey
13W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Carrie Neale
43W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Clare Holbrook
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Anne Givens
35W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Aimee Rodriguez
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Rachel Stoll
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Stephanie Barna
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kelly Penny
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Astyn Davis
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Jacie Vittitow
12W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Bonnie Black
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Marci Barke
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
JoAnn Morley
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ainsley Pierce
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Christl
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Beckey Fuller
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Carolyn Strickfaden
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Mandi Schmitz
21W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Amber James
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Julie Harner
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kaitlyn Scott
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.