Teams

DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-19vs Bent Tree/Sarché-Wilder W3.5Won 21
W#2 DoublesAmy Marable / Catherine Moss vs Jennifer Johnson / Emily Sarche7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTracey Berta vs Martha Sue Crowther6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenni Purser / Sheila Conner vs Mary Nelson / Amy Wagner6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJessica Pierce / Catherine Moss vs Corinne Carpenter / Molly Carson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Timmerman / Tracey Berta vs Emily Hildebrand / Angela Ray6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-05Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Berta / Holly Myers vs Natalie Gilbert / Becky Connet3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Evetts / TIFFANY KRIETE vs Tao Kang / Hong Zhang5-7, 3-6
2025-05-29vs Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesTIFFANY KRIETE / Holly Myers vs Marylene Leogier / Asheley Wagnon6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Frazure / Molly Holley vs Jana Milstein / Jena Anderson6-4, 6-1
2025-05-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Timmerman / TIFFANY KRIETE vs Brenda Bingham / Ryane Criswell5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Barrows / Catherine Moss vs Tracy Constantino / Heidi Fuller3-6, 1-6
2025-05-15vs Canyon Creek/Whitaker W3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesTracey Berta / Sheila Conner vs Colleen Petersen / Melanie Powell7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-12vs Royal Oaks/Copley W.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTracey Berta / Jenny Littlefield vs Julie Gasch / Kelley Green0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCatherine Moss vs Emily Cox5-7, 2-6
2025-05-08vs The Nelson/Stoll-Wood W3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Barrows / Molly Holley vs Jacie Vittitow / Aimee Rodriguez0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Heather Evetts
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.35
Amy Wandstrat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Tracey Berta
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Amy Timmerman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Laura Frazure
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Carol Barrows
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Shepardson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Moss
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Meredith Gibbs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Erin Threadgill
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.17
Jenny Littlefield
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.06
TIFFANY KRIETE
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Molly Holley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Varina Lin
usually #1 Singles 91%, also #2 Singles 9% · published
3.03
Mary Hope Burns
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Amy Marable
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Jenni Purser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sheila Conner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Frazure + Jenny Littlefield123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Barrows + Catherine Moss123 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Littlefield + Erin Threadgill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Evetts
20W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Amy Wandstrat
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Tracey Berta
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Amy Timmerman
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Laura Frazure
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Carol Barrows
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Shepardson
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Moss
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Meredith Gibbs
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Erin Threadgill
13W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jenny Littlefield
14W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
TIFFANY KRIETE
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Molly Holley
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Varina Lin
17W–25L career · 11 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Mary Hope Burns
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Amy Marable
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Jenni Purser
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Conner
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.