Teams

Farthing, Dawn

2024 Tri-Level 40 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-14vs Rector, StacieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Slade / Chiali Register vs Jennifer Otto / Jayme Griffin1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth MacPherson / Elizabeth Archer vs Cindy Page / Amanda Galey6-4, 7-5
2024-07-06vs Shaw, LisaLost 12
W#1 DoublesGayla Elliott / Colleen Roberts vs Ginny Dehart / Emily Harper6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Vizier / Jessie Humble vs Joey Sessums / Juli Johnson3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMallie Earl / Suzy Everett vs Haley Davis / Laura McMahon2-6, 4-6
2024-06-25vs Shaw, LisaWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Roberts / Cindy Hannon vs Lisa Shaw / Temple Waddell-Callahan6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmanda Vizier / Vanessa Wilson vs Lara Martin / Ellen Warren6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth MacPherson / Elizabeth Archer vs Nikki Ramsey / Laura McMahon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-18vs Davis, LaureeLost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Farthing / Cindy Hannon vs Dallas Clearman / Lisa Jeffcoat5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChiali Register / Jessie Humble vs Lauree Davis / Susan Jackson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Archer / Suzy Everett vs Jane Turner / Nancy Thompson3-6, 1-6
2024-06-11vs Rector, StacieWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hannon / Dawn Farthing vs Stacie Rector / Tracy Mason6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmanda Vizier / Vanessa Wilson vs Alissa Joseph / Jennifer Otto2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzy Everett / Mallie Earl vs Amanda Galey / Kelly Mitchell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-28vs Davis, LaureeWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Roberts / Cindy Hannon vs Dallas Clearman / Kathleen Morgan7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesVanessa Wilson / Jessie Humble vs Lauree Davis / Angie DeLeon3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElissa Woodruff / Elizabeth Archer vs Diane Barber / Lisa Tew6-1, 7-5
2024-05-21vs Rector, StacieWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hannon / Colleen Roberts vs Tracy Mason / Stacie Rector6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVanessa Wilson / Jessie Humble vs Jessica Langley / Jayme Griffin6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElissa Woodruff / Elizabeth MacPherson vs Kelly Mitchell / Cindy Page4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-14vs Shaw, LisaWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Hannon / Colleen Roberts vs Lisa Shaw / Emily Harper3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Vizier / Jessie Humble vs Lara Martin / Joey Sessums6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzy Everett / Elizabeth Archer vs Laura McMahon / Nikki Ramsey6-2, 7-5
2024-05-07vs Davis, LaureeWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hannon / Colleen Roberts vs Lisa Jeffcoat / Dallas Clearman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVanessa Wilson / Chiali Register vs Susan Jackson / Celia Coffey6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElizabeth MacPherson / Mallie Earl vs Lisa Tew / Nancy Thompson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Byrne
published 4.5
4.10
Cindy Hannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Dawn Farthing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Jessie Humble
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.84
Gayla Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Chiali Register
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Amanda Vizier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Elissa Woodruff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Elizabeth MacPherson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Mallie Earl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Elizabeth Archer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Suzy Everett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vanessa Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Byrne + Cindy Hannon303 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hannon + Gayla Elliott213 matchesnot enough data
Chiali Register + Jessie Humble213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debra Byrne
10W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Cindy Hannon
21W–7L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Dawn Farthing
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
Jessie Humble
84W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4.5
Gayla Elliott
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Chiali Register
40W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Amanda Vizier
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Elissa Woodruff
37W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Elizabeth MacPherson
26W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Mallie Earl
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Elizabeth Archer
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Suzy Everett
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.20
Vanessa Wilson
49W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.