Teams

Nutt - Tri18s W 4.5/4.0/3.5 Wed

2024 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-10vs Cartee Tri18s W 4.5/4.0/3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Nutt / Beth Mayer vs Alison Crews / Aundrea Hendley6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMarian Hogan / Jenny Kemp vs Linda Lowman / Clarissa Tatum6-4, 6-2
2024-07-03vs Smith Tri18s 4.5/4.0/3.5 W WedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCari Powell / Lauren Nutt vs Christina Rush / Jessica Bair-Epps7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Fogleman / Marian Hogan vs Julie Buchanan / Julia Fresina6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Nutt / Tara Burgio vs Collins Speed Pugh / Elisabeth Kraska7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-06vs Cartee Tri18s W 4.5/4.0/3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Nutt / Cari Powell vs Mimi Cartee / Erin Huffines6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-29vs Smith Tri18s 4.5/4.0/3.5 W WedWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarian Hogan / Jenny Kemp vs Ashley Xu / Lesley Rossato7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Bety Miranda
published 5
4.43
Denise Speight
published 4.5
4.37
Tiffany Brown
published
4.18
Beth Harris
published 4.5
4.08
Beth Mayer
published 4.5
3.83
Cari Powell
published 4
3.82
Marianna Bryce
published
3.80
Lauren Nutt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Julie Cooke
published
3.76
Tara Burgio
published
3.60
Marian Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Jenny Kemp
published
3.31
Martha Fogleman
published
3.13
Toni Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Fogleman + Toni Lewis2451% games+7.0% vs expected
Beth Mayer + Beth Harris7355% games−6.9% vs expected
Lauren Nutt + Tara Burgio314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Nutt + Beth Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bety Miranda
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.59
4.5
Denise Speight
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
4.43
Tiffany Brown
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Beth Harris
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Beth Mayer
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
4
Cari Powell
34W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Marianna Bryce
17W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Lauren Nutt
102W–81L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Julie Cooke
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Tara Burgio
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
Jenny Kemp
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Martha Fogleman
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Toni Lewis
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.